Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(4):388-92. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.660662.
Research has shown that rear-seated children are 36 to 40 percent safer than front-seated children. Because of the substantial differences in traffic safety culture that appear to exist in rural areas and the limited research regarding seat placement and rurality, this study seeks to contribute to the safety literature by determining at what rate children are riding in the front seat and whether differences exist between rural and urban areas in regards to child front seat placement.
Current child placement frequencies within vehicles were ascertained through direct observations of morning child drop-offs at randomly selected urban and rural elementary schools in eastern North Dakota during November and December of 2009, with a focus on children aged 12 or younger. Two observers wearing orange safety vests and carrying observation sheets were stationed at each elementary school a minimum of 45 min prior to each school's designated start time. Based on the vehicles that entered the school's parking lot/drop-off circle and from which a minimum of one child exited, observers were instructed to record vehicle type, presence of children in the front seat appearing to be younger than 13 years old, availability of room in the back seat, and placement of other children in the vehicle.
During November and December of 2009 a total of 537 vehicles were observed at urban schools and 150 vehicles were observed at rural schools. Of the 537 vehicles observed at urban schools, 28.7 percent had children seated in the front seat, whereas 41.3 percent of the 150 vehicles observed at rural schools had front-seated children. Significant urban/rural differences exist in child seat placement, with vehicles in rural areas much more likely to be carrying front-seated children than vehicles in urban areas.
Based on a sample of vehicles observed at urban and rural elementary schools in North Dakota, the results of this study indicate that there are significant rural/urban differences in child seat placement.
研究表明,后排座位上的儿童比前排座位上的儿童安全 36%至 40%。由于农村地区交通安全文化存在显著差异,且有关座位安置和农村地区的研究有限,因此本研究旨在通过确定儿童在前排座位上的乘车率以及农村和城市地区在儿童前排座位安置方面是否存在差异,为安全文献做出贡献。
2009 年 11 月至 12 月,通过在北达科他州东部随机选择的城市和农村小学进行的早晨儿童下车的直接观察,确定了车内当前的儿童安置频率,重点关注 12 岁或以下的儿童。两名身穿橙色安全背心并携带观察表的观察者在每所小学指定的上课时间前至少 45 分钟驻扎在每所小学。根据进入学校停车场/下车圈的车辆以及至少有一名儿童从车辆中出来的情况,观察者被指示记录车辆类型、在前排座位上出现的年龄小于 13 岁的儿童、后排座位的可用空间以及车辆中其他儿童的安置情况。
2009 年 11 月至 12 月,在城市学校观察到 537 辆车,在农村学校观察到 150 辆车。在城市学校观察到的 537 辆车中,有 28.7%的车辆有儿童坐在前排座位上,而在农村学校观察到的 150 辆车中,有 41.3%的车辆有儿童坐在前排座位上。城乡之间在儿童座椅安置方面存在显著差异,农村地区的车辆更有可能搭载前排座位上的儿童,而城市地区的车辆则不然。
基于在北达科他州城市和农村小学观察到的车辆样本,本研究的结果表明,在儿童座椅安置方面存在显著的城乡差异。