Suppr超能文献

[电子胎儿监护与不良结局管理:如何为临床医生开展并改进培训项目?]

[Electronic fetal monitoring and management of adverse outcomes: how to perform and improve a training program for clinicians?].

作者信息

Secourgeon J-F

机构信息

Service d'obstétrique, pôle femme-mère-enfant, centre hospitalier de la Côte-Basque, 13, avenue de l'Interne-Jacques-Loëb, 64100 Bayonne, France.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Oct;41(6):526-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

Abstract

Electronic fetal monitoring during labor is the most commonly used method to evaluate the fetal status, but it remains exposed to some criticism. By comparison with intermittent auscultation and in the light of the results of the great studies in the last 30 years, it may be accused its failure to improve the neonatal outcome and its responsibility in the increase on operative deliveries. Actually, the electronic fetal monitoring is a tool whose effectiveness is linked to the accuracy of the analysis developed by the clinician. Studies on assessment of the tracing interpretation indicate that there is always a lack of quality, which may be improved through training programs. It also reveals the benefit of the fetal blood sampling to reduce operative deliveries and the generalization of this method, in addition to electronic fetal monitoring, is recommended by referral agencies. More generally, the continuous monitoring is only a part of the patient safety strategy in the labour ward and we are currently observing, in some European countries and in the United States, the development of training programs concerning the management of the adverse outcomes in obstetrics. The good performances related to the quality of care are demonstrated by the findings of the studies performed in the centers that have implemented an active training policy. In France, the professionals directly involved in the field of the perinatology should benefit from such educational programs that could be organized within the care networks under the authority of referral agencies.

摘要

分娩期间的电子胎儿监护是评估胎儿状况最常用的方法,但仍受到一些批评。与间歇性听诊相比,根据过去30年大量研究的结果,它可能被指责未能改善新生儿结局以及应对剖宫产率上升负有责任。实际上,电子胎儿监护是一种工具,其有效性与临床医生所做分析的准确性相关。关于监护曲线解读评估的研究表明,其质量始终欠佳,可通过培训项目加以改善。研究还揭示了胎儿血样采集在降低剖宫产率方面的益处,推荐机构建议除电子胎儿监护外推广这种方法。更普遍地说,持续监护只是产房患者安全策略的一部分,目前在一些欧洲国家和美国,我们看到有关产科不良结局管理的培训项目正在开展。实施积极培训政策的中心所开展研究的结果表明了与护理质量相关的良好表现。在法国,直接参与围产医学领域工作的专业人员应能受益于此类教育项目,这些项目可在推荐机构的授权下在护理网络内组织开展。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验