Castañeda Sheila F, Holscher Jessica, Mumman Manpreet K, Salgado Hugo, Keir Katherine B, Foster-Fishman Pennie G, Talavera Gregory A
San Diego State University Graduate School of Public Health, USA.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Summer;6(2):219-26. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0016.
Readiness can influence whether health interventions are implemented in, and ultimately integrated into, communities. Although there is significant research interest in readiness and capacity for change, the measurement of these constructs is still in its infancy.
The purpose of this review was to integrate existing assessment models of community and organizational readiness.
The database PubMed was searched for articles; articles, book chapters, and practitioner guides identified as references cited in the list of core articles.
Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) Empirical research, (2) identified community or organizational readiness for innovative health programming in the study's title, purpose, research questions, or hypotheses, and (3) identified methods to measure these constructs. Duplicate articles were deleted and measures published before 1995 were excluded. The search yielded 150 studies; 13 met all criteria.
This article presents the results of a critical review of 13 community and organizational readiness assessment models, stemming from articles, chapters, and practitioner's guides focusing on assessing, developing, and sustaining community and organizational readiness for innovative public health programs.
Readiness is multidimensional and different models place emphasis on different components of readiness, such as (1) community and organizational climate that facilitates change, (2) attitudes and current efforts toward prevention, (3) commitment to change, and (4) capacity to implement change. When initiating the program planning process, it is essential to assess these four domains of readiness to determine how they apply to the nuances across different communities. Thus, community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships, in efforts to focus on public health problems, may consider using readiness assessments as a tool for tailoring intervention efforts to the needs of the community.
准备情况会影响健康干预措施是否能在社区中得以实施并最终融入其中。尽管对变革的准备情况和能力存在大量研究兴趣,但对这些概念的测量仍处于起步阶段。
本综述的目的是整合现有的社区和组织准备情况评估模型。
在数据库PubMed中检索文章;将在核心文章列表中被引为参考文献的文章、书籍章节及从业者指南纳入。
符合以下标准的研究被纳入:(1)实证研究;(2)在研究的标题、目的、研究问题或假设中确定了社区或组织对创新性健康规划的准备情况;(3)确定了测量这些概念的方法。删除重复文章并排除1995年之前发表的测量方法。检索共得到150项研究;13项符合所有标准。
本文呈现了对13个社区和组织准备情况评估模型进行批判性综述的结果,这些模型源自专注于评估、发展和维持社区及组织对创新性公共卫生项目的准备情况的文章、章节及从业者指南。
准备情况是多维度的,不同模型强调准备情况的不同组成部分,例如:(1)促进变革的社区和组织氛围;(2)对预防的态度及当前所做的努力;(3)变革的承诺;(4)实施变革的能力。在启动项目规划过程时,评估准备情况的这四个领域以确定它们如何适用于不同社区的细微差别至关重要。因此,致力于关注公共卫生问题的基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)伙伴关系,可考虑使用准备情况评估作为根据社区需求调整干预措施的工具。