• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医疗保健组织实施学习型健康系统的准备情况:使用德尔菲法进行问卷验证的方案

Assessing healthcare organisations' readiness to implement a learning health system: protocol for questionnaire validation using a Delphi method.

作者信息

Giroux Catherine M, Zomahoun Hervé Tchala Vignon, Boies Sophie, Bush Paula, Alkhaldi Mohammed, Kengne Talla Pascaline, Poitras Marie-Eve, Couturier Yves, Ahmed Sara

机构信息

McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Unit, Institut national d'excellence en sante et en services sociaux du Quebec, Québec, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 25;15(8):e088720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088720.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088720
PMID:40854846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12382543/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the health sciences, it can take up to 17 years for 14% of research findings to be adopted in clinical practice. Adopting a learning health system (LHS) approach may help accelerate the transition of medicoadministrative and clinical data to knowledge, knowledge to performance and performance to data. However, little is currently known about whether healthcare organisations are both willing and able to adopt such an innovation. Therefore, the aim of this study is to generate validity evidence in support of a measure assessing healthcare organisations' readiness to implement an LHS approach.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A three-round Delphi method will be used to establish consensus on the relevance, clarity and comprehensiveness of the LHS readiness questionnaire's domains, subdomains and items. The questionnaire has been developed based on a review of the literature. Participants with expertise in LHS across Canada and internationally will be purposively recruited using a modified Dillman approach, with opportunities for additional snowball sampling. Descriptive statistics will be calculated from all closed-ended Delphi survey responses. A conventional content analysis will be conducted on all open-ended responses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from the McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (AO3-E23-24B). The findings of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, knowledge mobilisation workshops and through policy briefs and position papers.

摘要

引言

在健康科学领域,14%的研究成果可能需要长达17年才能应用于临床实践。采用学习型健康系统(LHS)方法可能有助于加速医疗管理和临床数据向知识的转化、知识向绩效的转化以及绩效向数据的转化。然而,目前对于医疗机构是否愿意且能够采用这种创新方法知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是生成有效性证据,以支持一项评估医疗机构准备好实施LHS方法的措施。

方法与分析

将采用三轮德尔菲法就LHS准备情况问卷的领域、子领域和项目的相关性、清晰度和全面性达成共识。该问卷是在文献综述的基础上制定的。将采用改良的迪尔曼方法有目的地招募加拿大和国际上在LHS方面具有专业知识的参与者,并提供额外的滚雪球抽样机会。将根据所有封闭式德尔菲调查回复计算描述性统计数据。将对所有开放式回复进行常规内容分析。

伦理与传播

已获得麦吉尔大学医学与健康科学学院机构审查委员会(AO3-E23-24B)的伦理批准。本研究的结果将在同行评审的出版物、学术会议、知识传播研讨会以及通过政策简报和立场文件进行传播。

相似文献

1
Assessing healthcare organisations' readiness to implement a learning health system: protocol for questionnaire validation using a Delphi method.评估医疗保健组织实施学习型健康系统的准备情况:使用德尔菲法进行问卷验证的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 25;15(8):e088720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088720.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Self-Assessment Organisational Readiness Tool (SORT) for Nursing Research Capacity Development: Results of a UK Delphi Study.用于护理研究能力发展的自我评估组织准备工具(SORT):英国德尔菲研究结果
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70084. doi: 10.1111/inr.70084.
4
Best Practice Guidance for Male Individuals Using Anabolic Androgenic Steroids in Recreational Sports Within Primary Care: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Consensus Study.基层医疗中男性在休闲运动中使用合成代谢雄激素类固醇的最佳实践指南:改良德尔菲共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 18;14:e65233. doi: 10.2196/65233.
5
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Protocol for developing a core outcome set for medicines safety at transitions of care: a systematic review, qualitative study and Delphi consensus.制定照护转接时药物安全核心结局集的方案:一项系统评价、定性研究及德尔菲共识法
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 1;15(7):e095343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095343.
8
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
9
Development and validation of critical appraisal tool for individual participant data meta-analysis: protocol for a modified e-Delphi study.个体参与者数据荟萃分析的批判性评价工具的开发与验证:一项改良的电子德尔菲研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 25;15(6):e097297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097297.
10
Developing a core outcome set for gender-affirming healthcare in transgender and gender diverse adults in Sweden using the Delphi approach: a study protocol.采用德尔菲法为瑞典跨性别和性别多样化成年人制定性别确认医疗保健核心结局集:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):e098300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098300.

本文引用的文献

1
Sample size in multistakeholder Delphi surveys: at what minimum sample size do replicability of results stabilize?多利益相关方德尔菲调查中的样本量:结果的可重复性在什么最小样本量时会趋于稳定?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;174:111485. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111485. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Implementation strategies and outcome measures for advancing learning health systems: a mixed methods systematic review.推进学习健康系统的实施策略和结果衡量指标:一项混合方法系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Nov 27;21(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01071-w.
3
Defining the Learning Health Care System: An International Health System Leadership Perspective.
定义学习型医疗保健系统:国际医疗系统领导力视角。
Acad Med. 2024 Feb 1;99(2):215-220. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005540. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
4
Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach.开发医疗保健提供者的电子咨询反思性学习工具:实用混合方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 16;24(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01948-9.
5
Learning health systems: Driving real-world impact in mental health and substance use disorder research.学习型健康系统:推动心理健康与物质使用障碍研究的实际影响
FASEB Bioadv. 2021 Apr 7;3(8):626-638. doi: 10.1096/fba.2020-00124. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks.一种用于学习网络的成熟度网格评估工具。
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Jun 26;5(2):e10232. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10232. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Multi-level analysis of the learning health system: Integrating contributions from research on organizations and implementation.学习型健康系统的多层次分析:整合来自组织研究与实施研究的贡献。
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Apr 2;5(2):e10226. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10226. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Learning health systems from an academic perspective: establishing a collaboratory within a school of medicine and health sciences.从学术角度学习卫生系统:在医学院和健康科学学院内建立合作研究室。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1917038. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1917038.
9
Challenges for healthcare communication during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间医疗保健沟通面临的挑战。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):215-216. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.006.
10
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map.健康科学中的德尔菲技术:一幅图谱。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;8:457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457. eCollection 2020.