Department of Orthopaedics, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2450-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2430-9. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
Pulsatile movements of the dura mater have been interpreted as a sign that the cord is free within the subarachnoid space, with no extrinsic compression. However, the association between restoration of pulsation and adequate decompression of the spinal cord has not been established. The present study investigated the relationship between the extent of spinal cord decompression and spinal cord and dural pulsations based on quantitative analysis of intraoperative ultrasonography (US).
Eighty-five consecutive patients (55 males, 30 females; mean age, 64 ± 13 years) who underwent cervical double-door laminoplasty to relieve compressive myelopathy were enrolled. Spinal cord decompression status was classified as: Type 1 (non-contact), the subarachnoid space was retained on the ventral side of the cord, Type 2 (contact and apart), the cord showed both contact with and separation from the anterior element of the cervical spine, or Type 3 (contact), the cord showed continuous contact with the anterior element of the cervical spine. Spinal cord and dura mater dynamics were quantitatively analyzed using automatic video-tracking software. Furthermore, the intensity of spinal and dural pulsation was compared with the recovery of motor function at 1 year after surgery as measured by increase in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ).
Spinal cord pulsation amplitude ranged from 0.01 to 0.84 mm (mean 0.30 ± 0.16 mm) and dural pulsation amplitude ranged from 0.01 to 0.38 mm (mean 0.14 ± 0.08 mm). Average spinal cord pulsation amplitude in Type 2 patients was significantly larger than that in the other groups, whereas, average dural pulsation amplitudes were similar for all three groups. There was a significant correlation between spinal cord and dural pulsation amplitudes in Type 1 patients, but not in Type 2 or Type 3 patients. Type 3 patients showed a particularly poor correlation between spinal cord and dural pulsations. Spinal cord pulsation amplitude was moderately correlated with the recovery of motor function evaluated by JOACMEQ.
The present results suggest that restoration of dural pulsation is not an adequate indicator of sufficient decompression of the spinal cord following a surgical procedure.
硬脑膜的脉冲运动被解释为脊髓在蛛网膜下腔自由的迹象,没有外在的压迫。然而,脉冲恢复与脊髓充分减压之间的关联尚未建立。本研究通过术中超声(US)的定量分析,研究了脊髓减压程度与脊髓和硬脑膜脉冲之间的关系。
纳入 85 例连续接受颈椎双开门椎板成形术以缓解压迫性脊髓病的患者(55 例男性,30 例女性;平均年龄 64 ± 13 岁)。脊髓减压状态分为:1 型(无接触),蛛网膜下腔保留在脊髓腹侧;2 型(接触和分离),脊髓与颈椎前结构既接触又分离;3 型(接触),脊髓与颈椎前结构连续接触。使用自动视频跟踪软件对脊髓和硬脑膜的动力学进行定量分析。此外,还将脊髓和硬脑膜搏动的强度与术后 1 年日本矫形协会颈椎脊髓病评估问卷(JOACMEQ)测量的运动功能恢复进行了比较。
脊髓搏动幅度范围为 0.01 至 0.84 毫米(平均 0.30 ± 0.16 毫米),硬脑膜搏动幅度范围为 0.01 至 0.38 毫米(平均 0.14 ± 0.08 毫米)。2 型患者的平均脊髓搏动幅度明显大于其他组,而三组的平均硬脑膜搏动幅度相似。1 型患者的脊髓和硬脑膜搏动幅度之间存在显著相关性,但 2 型或 3 型患者之间没有相关性。3 型患者的脊髓和硬脑膜搏动之间的相关性尤其差。脊髓搏动幅度与 JOACMEQ 评估的运动功能恢复中度相关。
本研究结果表明,硬脑膜搏动的恢复并不是手术治疗后脊髓充分减压的充分指标。