Suppr超能文献

通过偏见素养促进制度变革。

Promoting Institutional Change Through Bias Literacy.

作者信息

Carnes Molly, Devine Patricia G, Isaac Carol, Manwell Linda Baier, Ford Cecelia E, Byars-Winston Angela, Fine Eve, Sheridan Jennifer Thurik

机构信息

Center for Women's Health Research and Department of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry and Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI), University of Wisconsin-Madison; and William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Divers High Educ. 2012 Jun;5(2):63-77. doi: 10.1037/a0028128. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

Abstract

The National Science Foundation and others conclude that institutional transformation is required to ensure equal opportunities for the participation and advancement of men and women in academic science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM). Such transformation requires changing the habitual attitudes and behaviors of faculty. Approaching implicit bias as a remediable habit, we present the theoretical basis and conceptual model underpinning an educational intervention to promote bias literacy among university faculty as a step toward institutional transformation regarding gender equity. We describe the development and implementation of a Bias Literacy Workshop in detail so others can replicate or adapt it to their setting. Of the 220 (167 faculty and 53 nonfaculty) attendees from the initial 17 departments/divisions offered this workshop, all 180 who completed a written evaluation found the workshop at least "somewhat useful" and 74% found it "very useful." Over 68% indicated increased knowledge of the workshop material. Of the 186 participants who wrote a commitment to engage in new activities to promote gender equity, 87% incorporated specific workshop content. Twenty-four participants were interviewed 4-6 months after attending the workshop; 75% of these not only demonstrated increased bias awareness, but described plans to change-or had actually changed-behaviors because of the workshop. Based on our sample of faculty from a Midwestern university, we conclude that at least one third of STEMM faculty who are invited will attend a 2.5-hr Bias Literacy Workshop, that nearly all will find it useful, and that most will complete a written commitment to promoting gender equity. These findings suggest that this educational intervention may effectively promote institutional change regarding gender equity.

摘要

美国国家科学基金会及其他机构得出结论,认为需要进行制度变革,以确保男性和女性在学术科学、技术、工程、数学和医学(STEMM)领域有平等的参与和晋升机会。这种变革需要改变教师的习惯态度和行为。我们将隐性偏见视为一种可纠正的习惯,提出了一种教育干预措施的理论基础和概念模型,以提高大学教师的偏见认知素养,作为实现性别平等制度变革的一步。我们详细描述了偏见认知素养工作坊的开发和实施过程,以便其他人能够复制或根据自身情况进行调整。在最初提供该工作坊的17个部门/单位的220名参与者(167名教师和53名非教师)中,所有180名完成书面评估的参与者都认为该工作坊至少“有点有用”,74%的人认为“非常有用”。超过68%的人表示对工作坊材料的了解有所增加。在186名承诺参与促进性别平等新活动的参与者中,87%纳入了工作坊的具体内容。24名参与者在参加工作坊4至6个月后接受了访谈;其中75%的人不仅表现出更高的偏见意识,还描述了因工作坊而改变行为的计划——或者实际上已经改变了行为。基于我们对一所中西部大学教师的抽样调查,我们得出结论,至少三分之一受邀参加为期2.5小时偏见认知素养工作坊的STEMM教师会参加,几乎所有人都会认为它有用,而且大多数人会完成一份促进性别平等的书面承诺。这些发现表明,这种教育干预可能有效地促进性别平等方面的制度变革。

相似文献

1
Promoting Institutional Change Through Bias Literacy.
J Divers High Educ. 2012 Jun;5(2):63-77. doi: 10.1037/a0028128. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
3
A Gender Bias Habit-Breaking Intervention Led to Increased Hiring of Female Faculty in STEMM Departments.
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 Nov;73:211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
Difficult Dialogues: Negotiating Faculty Responses to a Gender Bias Literacy Training Program.
Qual Rep. 2016 Jul;21(7):1243-1265. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2205. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
Reducing Implicit Gender Leadership Bias in Academic Medicine With an Educational Intervention.
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1143-50. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001099.
6
Engaging faculty in a workshop intervention on overcoming the influence of implicit bias.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jun 8;5(1):e135. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.796. eCollection 2021.
7
Effect of a Workshop to Break the Bias Habit for Internal Medicine Faculty: A Multisite Cluster Randomized Controlled Study.
Acad Med. 2023 Oct 1;98(10):1211-1219. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005271. Epub 2023 May 23.
8
Improving Department Climate Through Bias Literacy: One College's Experience.
J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2021;27(2):87-106. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2021032729.
10
How Medical Educators Can Foster Equity and Inclusion in Their Teaching: A Faculty Development Workshop Series.
Acad Med. 2020 Dec;95(12S Addressing Harmful Bias and Eliminating Discrimination in Health Professions Learning Environments):S71-S76. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003687.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and pilot test of an implicit bias mitigation curriculum for clinicians.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 6;11:1316475. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1316475. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of a Workshop to Break the Bias Habit for Internal Medicine Faculty: A Multisite Cluster Randomized Controlled Study.
Acad Med. 2023 Oct 1;98(10):1211-1219. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005271. Epub 2023 May 23.
4
Not yet defect-free: the current landscape for women in computational materials research.
NPJ Comput Mater. 2023;9(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41524-023-01054-z. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
5
Exploring female otolaryngologists' experiences with gender bias and microaggressions: a cross sectional Canadian survey.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 6;52(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40463-022-00618-1.
6
Learning to detect sexism: An evaluation of the effects of a brief video-based intervention using ROC analysis.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1005633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005633. eCollection 2022.
8
Implicit bias instruction across disciplines related to the social determinants of health: a scoping review.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 May;28(2):541-587. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10168-w. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
9
Changing the face of academic medicine: an equity action plan for institutions.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 May 20;6(1):e78. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.408. eCollection 2022.
10
Promoting Achievement for Community College STEM Students through Equity-Minded Practices.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Jun;21(2):ar25. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-09-0237.

本文引用的文献

1
Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?
Br J Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;50(3):519-35. doi: 10.1348/014466610X525280. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
3
The active control of prejudice: unpacking the intentions guiding control efforts.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;96(3):640-52. doi: 10.1037/a0012960.
4
Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs external cues.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Jun;1(1):26-36. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl002.
5
Requesting a commitment to change: conditions that produce behavioral or attitudinal commitment.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Spring;28(2):60-6. doi: 10.1002/chp.158.
6
Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review.
JAMA. 2007 Sep 5;298(9):1023-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1023.
7
A dynamic model of guilt: implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice.
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jun;18(6):524-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01933.x.
8
Moving innovations into treatment: A stage-based approach to program change.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Sep;33(2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.023. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
9
NIH Director's Pioneer Awards: could the selection process be biased against women?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Oct;14(8):684-91. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.684.
10
Diversity in academic medicine: the stages of change model.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Jul-Aug;14(6):471-5. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.471.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验