• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚麻醉下电抽搐治疗后痫性抑制不佳的处理:两例报告。

Management of poor postictal suppression during electroconvulsive therapy with propofol anesthesia: a report of two cases.

机构信息

Geropsychiatry Section (116A), James A. Haley VA Hospital, University of South Florida College of Medicine, 13000 Bruce B. Downs BLVD, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2012 Dec;26(6):925-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1455-x. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00540-012-1455-x
PMID:22825577
Abstract

There is increasing evidence that a greater degree of postictal suppression (the abruptness and magnitude of the EEG voltage drop at the end of the seizure) may be associated with better clinical response to electroconvulsive therapy. Retrospective studies have shown better postictal suppression when propofol is used for induction rather than the more commonly used methohexital. We report two patients in whom poor postictal suppression was rectified by switching from methohexital to propofol. The clinical significance of this improvement in postictal suppression is unclear, and prospective studies will be needed to clarify any clinical benefits.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,更大程度的发作后抑制(癫痫发作结束时 EEG 电压下降的突然性和幅度)可能与电惊厥治疗的更好临床反应相关。回顾性研究表明,与更常用的甲己炔巴比妥钠相比,使用异丙酚诱导时发作后抑制更好。我们报告了两例患者,他们将甲己炔巴比妥钠切换为异丙酚后,发作后抑制不良得到纠正。这种发作后抑制改善的临床意义尚不清楚,需要前瞻性研究来阐明任何临床益处。

相似文献

1
Management of poor postictal suppression during electroconvulsive therapy with propofol anesthesia: a report of two cases.丙泊酚麻醉下电抽搐治疗后痫性抑制不佳的处理:两例报告。
J Anesth. 2012 Dec;26(6):925-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1455-x. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
2
Propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized, double-blind comparison of electroconvulsive therapy seizure quality, therapeutic efficacy, and cognitive performance.丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥作为电休克治疗的麻醉剂:电休克治疗癫痫发作质量、治疗效果及认知表现的随机双盲比较
J ECT. 2007 Dec;23(4):239-43. doi: 10.1097/0b013e31814da971.
3
Propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a comparison of seizure-quality measures and vital signs.丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥作为电休克治疗(ECT)的麻醉剂:癫痫发作质量指标与生命体征的比较
J ECT. 1998 Mar;14(1):28-35.
4
A within-subject comparison of propofol and methohexital anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy.丙泊酚和依托咪酯麻醉用于电抽搐治疗的受试者内比较。
J ECT. 2012 Mar;28(1):14-9. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31823a4220.
5
The influence of anaesthetic medication on safety, tolerability and clinical effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy.麻醉药物对电抽搐治疗的安全性、耐受性和临床疗效的影响。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;11(2 Pt 2):447-56. doi: 10.1080/15622970902960897.
6
Can the bispectral index be used to predict seizure time and awakening after electroconvulsive therapy?脑电双频指数能否用于预测电休克治疗后的癫痫发作时间及苏醒情况?
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1636-1639. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000066018.13553.08.
7
A comparison of propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for ECT: effects on seizure duration, therapeutic outcome, and memory.丙泊酚与美索比妥作为电休克治疗麻醉剂的比较:对癫痫发作持续时间、治疗效果及记忆的影响
Biol Psychiatry. 1994 Feb 1;35(3):179-89. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)91150-9.
8
The comparative effects of methohexital, propofol, and etomidate for electroconvulsive therapy.甲己炔巴比妥、丙泊酚和依托咪酯用于电休克治疗的比较效果。
Anesth Analg. 1995 Sep;81(3):596-602. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199509000-00031.
9
Efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy after propofol and methohexital anesthesia.丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥麻醉后电休克治疗的疗效
Convuls Ther. 1994 Sep;10(3):212-9.
10
Within-subject comparison of propofol and methohexital anesthesia.丙泊酚与美索比妥麻醉的受试者内比较
J ECT. 2012 Dec;28(4):256. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3182548faf.

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychiatric Patient as a Health Resource Consumer: Costs Associated with Electroconvulsive Therapy.作为健康资源消费者的精神病患者:与电休克治疗相关的成本
Front Psychol. 2016 May 27;7:790. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00790. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Ictal physiological characteristics of remitters during bilateral electroconvulsive therapy.电抽搐治疗期间缓解者的发作期生理特征。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Feb 28;185(3):462-4. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
2
The influence of anaesthetic medication on safety, tolerability and clinical effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy.麻醉药物对电抽搐治疗的安全性、耐受性和临床疗效的影响。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;11(2 Pt 2):447-56. doi: 10.1080/15622970902960897.
3
Propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized, double-blind comparison of electroconvulsive therapy seizure quality, therapeutic efficacy, and cognitive performance.
丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥作为电休克治疗的麻醉剂:电休克治疗癫痫发作质量、治疗效果及认知表现的随机双盲比较
J ECT. 2007 Dec;23(4):239-43. doi: 10.1097/0b013e31814da971.
4
Postictal suppression correlates with therapeutic efficacy for depression in bilateral sine and pulse wave electroconvulsive therapy.发作后抑制与双侧正弦和脉冲波电休克治疗中抑郁症的治疗效果相关。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Apr;61(2):168-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01632.x.
5
A retrospective comparison of anesthetic agents in electroconvulsive therapy.电休克治疗中麻醉剂的回顾性比较
J ECT. 2006 Dec;22(4):243-6. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000244238.17791.a4.
6
Stimulus titration and ECT dosing.刺激滴定与电休克治疗剂量
J ECT. 2002 Mar;18(1):3-9; discussion 14-5. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200203000-00002.
7
Propofol [correction of propfol] versus methohexital for electroconvulsive therapy: a meta-analysis.丙泊酚与美索比妥用于电休克治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。 (注:原文中“propfol”有误,正确拼写为“propofol” ,译文已按正确拼写翻译)
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001 Apr;13(2):93-8. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200104000-00005.
8
Propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a comparison of seizure-quality measures and vital signs.丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥作为电休克治疗(ECT)的麻醉剂:癫痫发作质量指标与生命体征的比较
J ECT. 1998 Mar;14(1):28-35.
9
Is postictal electrical silence a predictor of response to electroconvulsive therapy?发作后电静息是电休克治疗反应的预测指标吗?
J Affect Disord. 1996 Nov 4;41(1):55-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00066-3.
10
A comparison of propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for ECT: effects on seizure duration, therapeutic outcome, and memory.丙泊酚与美索比妥作为电休克治疗麻醉剂的比较:对癫痫发作持续时间、治疗效果及记忆的影响
Biol Psychiatry. 1994 Feb 1;35(3):179-89. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)91150-9.