Patient participation in surgical treatment decision making from the patients' perspective: validation of an instrument.
作者信息
Heggland Liv-Helen, Ogaard Torvald, Mikkelsen Aslaug, Hausken Kjell
机构信息
Surgical Division, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.
出版信息
Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:939675. doi: 10.1155/2012/939675. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to describe the development of a new, brief, easy-to-administer self-reported instrument designed to assess patient participation in decision making in surgical treatment. We describe item generation, psychometric testing, and validity of the instrument. The final scale consisted of four factors: information dissemination (5 items), formulation of options (4 items), integration of information (4 items), and control (3 items). The analysis demonstrated a reasonable level of construct validity and reliability. The instrument applies to patients in surgical wards and can be used to identify the health services that are being provided and the areas that could strengthen patient participation.
摘要
相似文献
1
Patient participation in surgical treatment decision making from the patients' perspective: validation of an instrument.
Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:939675. doi: 10.1155/2012/939675. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
2
Measuring patient participation in surgical treatment decision-making from healthcare professionals' perspective.
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Feb;23(3-4):482-91. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12184. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
3
[Development and test-theoretical analysis of an instrument for data collection on patients' preferences and experiences concerning participation in nursing care decisions in acute hospitals].
Pflege. 2009 Dec;22(6):401-9. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302.22.6.401.
4
Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 22;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0656-2.
5
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.
7
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
8
The evaluation of nursing students by patients instrument (ENSPA): Development and validation.
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104391. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104391. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
9
The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171804. eCollection 2017.
10
Validation of the patients' perceived involvement in care scale among patients with chronic pain.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Sep;27(3):740-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01066.x. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
引用本文的文献
1
Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042003.
本文引用的文献
1
Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):313-24. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 May 4.
2
[User involvement in the Danish health care sector].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2009 May 11;171(20):1663-6.
3
Measuring (shared) decision-making--a review of psychometric instruments.
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(4):259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.029.
4
Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: The case of shared treatment decision-making.
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.018. Epub 2006 Sep 26.
5
Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Nov;61(10):2252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015.
6
Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
7
Clinical issues in shared decision-making applied to breast cancer.
Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):222-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00241.x.
8
Differential effects of cancer rehabilitation depending on diagnosis and patients' cognitive coping style.
Psychosom Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;64(6):971-80. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000028825.64279.f2.
9
Patient decision-making behavior: an emerging paradigm for nursing science.
Nurs Res. 2001 Sep-Oct;50(5):267-74. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00003.
10
Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):425-45. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425.
Zotero 插件