Mortenson W Ben, Auger Claudine, Miller William C
Scand J Occup Ther. 2012 Sep;19(5):464-5. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2012.708055. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
This letter to the editor is in response to the article by Pettersson, Pettersson and Frisk entitled, "ICF from an occupational therapy perspective in adult care: an integrative literature review". Given the breadth of this topic, the authors have done an admirable job in their survey of the topic. One area we felt deserved additional attention was the inadequate way the ICF classification system codes mobility assistive technology use. We also offer a point of clarification about the Wheelchair Outcome Measure, which was identified incorrectly as the only wheelchair specific measure that could measure activity and participation.
这封致编辑的信是对彼得松、彼得松和弗里斯克所著题为《成人护理中职业治疗视角下的国际功能、残疾和健康分类:综合文献综述》一文的回应。鉴于该主题的广度,作者在对该主题的调查中做得相当出色。我们认为值得额外关注的一个领域是国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)系统对移动辅助技术使用进行编码的方式存在不足。我们还对轮椅结果测量提出一点澄清,它被错误地认定为唯一能够测量活动和参与度的特定轮椅测量方法。