Kochi institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Monobe B200, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan.
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012 Sep;35(6):390-5. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
Real-time PCR has been widely used to evaluate gene abundance in natural microbial habitats. However, PCR-inhibitory substances often reduce the efficiency of PCR, leading to the underestimation of target gene copy numbers. Digital PCR using microfluidics is a new approach that allows absolute quantification of DNA molecules. In this study, digital PCR was applied to environmental samples, and the effect of PCR inhibitors on DNA quantification was tested. In the control experiment using λ DNA and humic acids, underestimation of λ DNA at 1/4400 of the theoretical value was observed with 6.58 ng μL(-1) humic acids. In contrast, digital PCR provided accurate quantification data with a concentration of humic acids up to 9.34 ng μL(-1). The inhibitory effect of paddy field soil extract on quantification of the archaeal 16S rRNA gene was also tested. By diluting the DNA extract, quantified copy numbers from real-time PCR and digital PCR became similar, indicating that dilution was a useful way to remedy PCR inhibition. The dilution strategy was, however, not applicable to all natural environmental samples. For example, when marine subsurface sediment samples were tested the copy number of archaeal 16S rRNA genes was 1.04×10(3) copies/g-sediment by digital PCR, whereas real-time PCR only resulted in 4.64×10(2) copies/g-sediment, which was most likely due to an inhibitory effect. The data from this study demonstrated that inhibitory substances had little effect on DNA quantification using microfluidics and digital PCR, and showed the great advantages of digital PCR in accurate quantifications of DNA extracted from various microbial habitats.
实时 PCR 已被广泛用于评估自然微生物生境中的基因丰度。然而,PCR 抑制剂物质通常会降低 PCR 的效率,导致目标基因拷贝数的低估。使用微流控技术的数字 PCR 是一种新的方法,可以对 DNA 分子进行绝对定量。在本研究中,数字 PCR 被应用于环境样品,并测试了 PCR 抑制剂对 DNA 定量的影响。在使用 λ DNA 和腐殖酸的对照实验中,当腐殖酸浓度为 6.58ng μL(-1)时,λ DNA 的估计值比理论值低 1/4400。相比之下,数字 PCR 提供了准确的定量数据,腐殖酸浓度高达 9.34ng μL(-1)。还测试了稻田土壤提取物对古菌 16S rRNA 基因定量的抑制作用。通过稀释 DNA 提取物,实时 PCR 和数字 PCR 的定量拷贝数变得相似,这表明稀释是一种补救 PCR 抑制的有用方法。然而,这种稀释策略并不适用于所有自然环境样品。例如,当测试海洋次表层沉积物样品时,数字 PCR 得到的古菌 16S rRNA 基因拷贝数为 1.04×10(3)拷贝/g-沉积物,而实时 PCR 仅得到 4.64×10(2)拷贝/g-沉积物,这很可能是由于抑制作用所致。本研究的数据表明,抑制物质对使用微流控技术和数字 PCR 进行 DNA 定量的影响很小,并显示了数字 PCR 在准确定量从各种微生物生境中提取的 DNA 方面的巨大优势。