Department of Clinical Pharmacy, 521 Parnassus Avenue, University of California-San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Jul-Aug;9(4):396-404. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
Community pharmacies have the potential to reduce the prevalence of tobacco use, yet most pharmacies do not integrate cessation activities into routine practice.
The objective of this study was to describe the recruitment strategy and participant yield for a 2-state, randomized trial evaluating 2 intervention approaches for increasing pharmacy-based referrals to tobacco quitlines.
Detailed study recruitment tracking forms were used to document all contact attempts between the study investigators and each potential study site. These data were analyzed to characterize the overall recruitment and consent process for community pharmacies and pharmacy personnel (pharmacists, technicians).
Achieving the target sample size of 64 study sites required contacting a total of 150 pharmacies (84 independent and 66 chain). Excluding 22 ineligible pharmacies, participation rates were 49% (32 of 65) for independent pharmacies and 51% (32 of 63) for chain pharmacies (50% overall). Across the 64 participating pharmacies, a total of 124 pharmacists (of 171; 73%) and 127 pharmacy technicians (of 215; 59%) were enrolled in the study. Pharmacies that chose not to participate most often cited time constraints as the primary reason. Overall, combining both the recruitment and consent process, a median of 5 contacts were made with each participating pharmacy (range, 2-19; interquartile range [IQR], 4-7), and the median overall duration of time elapsed from initial contact to consent was 25 days (range, 3-122 days; IQR, 12-47 days).
Results from this study suggest that community pharmacy personnel are receptive to participation in multisite, tobacco cessation clinical research trials. However, execution of a representative sampling and recruitment scheme for a multistate study in this practice setting is a time- and labor-intensive process.
社区药店有潜力降低烟草使用的流行率,但大多数药店并没有将戒烟活动纳入常规实践。
本研究的目的是描述一项 2 个州、随机试验的招募策略和参与者数量,该试验评估了两种增加基于药店的戒烟热线转诊的干预方法。
详细的研究招募跟踪表格用于记录研究调查人员与每个潜在研究地点之间的所有联系尝试。对这些数据进行分析,以描述社区药店和药剂师(药剂师、技术员)的总体招募和同意过程。
要达到 64 个研究地点的目标样本量,需要总共联系 150 家药店(84 家独立药店和 66 家连锁药店)。不包括 22 家不合格的药店,独立药店的参与率为 49%(32/65),连锁药店的参与率为 51%(32/63)(总体为 50%)。在 64 家参与的药店中,共有 124 名药剂师(171 名中的 124 名;73%)和 127 名药剂技术员(215 名中的 127 名;59%)参加了该研究。选择不参与的药店最常提到的主要原因是时间限制。总体而言,将招募和同意过程结合起来,每个参与的药店平均进行了 5 次联系(范围,2-19;四分位距[IQR],4-7),从首次联系到同意的平均总时间为 25 天(范围,3-122 天;IQR,12-47 天)。
这项研究的结果表明,社区药店人员愿意参与多地点、戒烟的临床研究试验。然而,在这种实践环境中执行多州研究的代表性抽样和招募计划是一个时间和劳动力密集型的过程。