Wallace H. Coulter School of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0535, USA.
J Biomech. 2012 Sep 21;45(14):2376-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
Total cavopulmonary connection is the result of a series of palliative surgical repairs performed on patients with single ventricle heart defects. The resulting anatomy has complex and unsteady hemodynamics characterized by flow mixing and flow separation. Although varying degrees of flow pulsatility have been observed in vivo, non-pulsatile (time-averaged) boundary conditions have traditionally been assumed in hemodynamic modeling, and only recently have pulsatile conditions been incorporated without completely characterizing their effect or importance. In this study, 3D numerical simulations with both pulsatile and non-pulsatile boundary conditions were performed for 24 patients with different anatomies and flow boundary conditions from Georgia Tech database. Flow structures, energy dissipation rates and pressure drops were compared under rest and simulated exercise conditions. It was found that flow pulsatility is the primary factor in determining the appropriate choice of boundary conditions, whereas the anatomic configuration and cardiac output had secondary effects. Results show that the hemodynamics can be strongly influenced by the presence of pulsatile flow. However, there was a minimum pulsatility threshold, identified by defining a weighted pulsatility index (wPI), above which the influence was significant. It was shown that when wPI<30%, the relative error in hemodynamic predictions using time-averaged boundary conditions was less than 10% compared to pulsatile simulations. In addition, when wPI<50, the relative error was less than 20%. A correlation was introduced to relate wPI to the relative error in predicting the flow metrics with non-pulsatile flow conditions.
全腔肺动脉连接是对单心室心脏缺陷患者进行一系列姑息性手术修复的结果。由此产生的解剖结构具有复杂且不稳定的血液动力学特性,表现为血流混合和分离。尽管在体内观察到了不同程度的脉动流,但在血液动力学建模中传统上假设了非脉动(时间平均)边界条件,直到最近才在不完整描述其影响或重要性的情况下纳入了脉动条件。在这项研究中,对来自佐治亚理工学院数据库的 24 名具有不同解剖结构和流量边界条件的患者进行了脉动和非脉动边界条件的 3D 数值模拟。在休息和模拟运动条件下比较了流动结构、能量耗散率和压降。结果发现,脉动流是确定边界条件适当选择的主要因素,而解剖结构和心输出量具有次要影响。结果表明,血液动力学可以受到脉动流的强烈影响。然而,存在一个最小的脉动阈值,通过定义加权脉动指数(wPI)来识别,高于该阈值时影响显著。结果表明,当 wPI<30%时,与脉动模拟相比,使用时间平均边界条件进行血液动力学预测的相对误差小于 10%。此外,当 wPI<50 时,相对误差小于 20%。引入了一个相关性,以将 wPI 与使用非脉动流条件预测流量指标的相对误差相关联。