Department of Physical Therapy, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Neurosci Lett. 2012 Aug 30;524(2):129-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.07.036. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the cutaneous analgesic effect of propranolol and compare with a local anesthetic lidocaine. The potencies and equipotent doses were determined for infiltrative cutaneous analgesia on the rat back by determination of dose-response curves for propranolol and lidocaine. Propranolol as well as lidocaine elicited dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia. On a 50% effective dose (ED(50)) basis, the relative potency was propranolol (10.3 [8.9-11.9]μmolkg(-1))>lidocaine (25.8 [24.3-27.8]μmolkg(-1)) (P<0.01). On equianalgesic doses (ED(25), ED(50), ED(75)), propranolol produced longer action of infiltrative cutaneous analgesia than lidocaine (P<0.01). Coadministration of lidocaine (25.8μmolkg(-1)) and propranolol (1.7μmolkg(-1)) exhibited greater blockade and duration than lidocaine (25.8μmolkg(-1)) or propranolol (1.7μmolkg(-1)) alone. Propranolol displayed more potent and longer duration of action than lidocaine at producing cutaneous analgesia. Furthermore, propranolol may prove useful as an adjuvant for lidocaine in producing cutaneous analgesia.
本研究旨在探讨普萘洛尔的皮肤镇痛作用,并与局部麻醉药利多卡因进行比较。通过测定普萘洛尔和利多卡因对大鼠背部浸润性皮肤镇痛的剂量-反应曲线,确定其效能和等效剂量。普萘洛尔和利多卡因均引起剂量依赖性皮肤镇痛。基于 50%有效剂量(ED(50)),相对效力为普萘洛尔(10.3[8.9-11.9]μmolkg(-1))>利多卡因(25.8[24.3-27.8]μmolkg(-1))(P<0.01)。在等镇痛剂量(ED(25)、ED(50)、ED(75))下,普萘洛尔产生的浸润性皮肤镇痛作用持续时间长于利多卡因(P<0.01)。利多卡因(25.8μmolkg(-1))和普萘洛尔(1.7μmolkg(-1))联合给药的阻滞作用和持续时间大于单独给予利多卡因(25.8μmolkg(-1))或普萘洛尔(1.7μmolkg(-1))。与利多卡因相比,普萘洛尔在产生皮肤镇痛方面表现出更强的作用和更长的作用持续时间。此外,普萘洛尔可能在利多卡因产生皮肤镇痛方面作为辅助药物证明有用。