Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche: Reumatologia, Sapienza Università di Roma, Policlinico Umberto 1°, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Roma.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Nov;51(11):2013-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes161. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
To assess the interobserver reliability between sonographers with different levels of experience in detecting inflammatory and structural damage abnormalities in patients with knee OA.
After achieving consensus on definitions and scanning protocols, three ultrasonographers with different levels of experience in musculoskeletal US examined the knees of nine patients with OA. US examinations were conducted with independent blinded evaluations of inflammatory (joint effusion, synovial hypertrophy, power Doppler signal, Baker's cysts) and structural (osteophytes, cortical bone irregularities, femoral hyaline cartilage abnormalities, protrusion of the medial meniscus) lesions. All abnormalities were scored by applying a dichotomous scale (0-1). In addition, at each knee joint site global scores for joint inflammation, cortical bone abnormalities and cartilage damage were calculated by summing the single-lesion scores. Reliability was assessed using kappa (κ) coefficients.
Seventeen knees were examined. Inflammatory abnormalities were observed with moderate to very good agreement (κ = 0.55-0.88) between the observers. From fair to very good agreement (κ = 0.31-0.82) was registered between sonographers for structural damage lesions. The overall κ was 0.716 for junior and 0.571 for beginner sonographers comparing their findings with those of senior sonographers.
This represents the first ultrasonographic study focusing on the analysis of interobserver reliability between sonographers with different levels of experience in demonstrating inflammatory and structural abnormalities in knee OA. Globally, even considering some variable results that were mainly obtained by the evaluation of single components of bone involvement, US offered a reliable assessment of a wide set of abnormalities in knee OA.
评估在检测膝骨关节炎患者炎症和结构损伤异常方面具有不同经验水平的超声医师之间的观察者间可靠性。
在就定义和扫描方案达成共识后,三名具有不同肌肉骨骼超声经验水平的超声医师对 9 名膝骨关节炎患者的膝关节进行了检查。超声检查采用独立的盲法评估炎症(关节积液、滑膜肥厚、功率多普勒信号、贝克氏囊肿)和结构(骨赘、皮质骨不规则、股骨透明软骨异常、内侧半月板突出)病变。所有异常均采用二项式评分(0-1)进行评分。此外,在每个膝关节部位,通过将单个病变评分相加来计算关节炎症、皮质骨异常和软骨损伤的总体评分。使用κ(κ)系数评估可靠性。
共检查了 17 个膝关节。观察者之间对炎症性异常的评估具有中度至非常好的一致性(κ=0.55-0.88)。观察者之间对结构损伤病变的评估具有从公平到非常好的一致性(κ=0.31-0.82)。初级和初学者超声医师与高级超声医师相比,他们的发现的总体κ值分别为 0.716 和 0.571。
这是第一项专门针对具有不同经验水平的超声医师在演示膝骨关节炎炎症和结构异常方面的观察者间可靠性进行分析的超声研究。总体而言,即使考虑到主要通过评估骨受累的单个成分获得的一些可变结果,超声仍为广泛的膝骨关节炎异常提供了可靠的评估。