Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, Rheumatology Clinic, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università degli studi di Ferrara, Clinica di Reumatologia, Ferrara, Italy.
RMD Open. 2019 Mar 8;5(1):e000795. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000795. eCollection 2019.
To evaluate the level of agreement on ultrasonographic (US) lesions among highly experienced sonographers as well as the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of inflammatory and structural US lesions in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the foot.
After a systematic literature review, a Delphi survey was performed to test definitions of US lesions in OA of the foot, including inflammatory lesions (ie, synovial hypertrophy [SH], joint effusion [JE], power Doppler signal [PD]), and structural abnormalities (ie, cartilage damage [CD] and osteophytes). Subsequently, the reliability of US in assessing the aforementioned lesions was tested on static images as well as during a live exercise. Reliability was assessed by kappa analyses and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) on a dichotomous and an ordinal scale.
Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for SH and JE evaluated by binary scoring was good for both components, while the intraobserver reliability for semiquantitative scoring of SH ranged from moderate in the web-based exercise (PABAK 0.49) to good (PABAK 0.8) in the live exercise. Reliability for CD and PD assessments were respectively good and excellent in all exercises (ranged from PABAK 0.61 to 0.79 for CD and 0.88 to 0.95 for PD). The interobserver reliability for the semiquantitative scoring of osteophytes was fair in the live exercise (PABAK 0.36) and moderate in the static exercise (PABAK 0.60).
Consensual US definitions were found to be reliable for assessing inflammatory lesions in OA of the foot, while the use of US to assess structural damage requires further studies.
评估经验丰富的超声医师在超声(US)病变方面的一致性水平,以及在足部骨关节炎(OA)患者中,炎症和结构 US 病变的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。
在系统文献回顾后,进行了一项 Delphi 调查,以测试足部 OA 的 US 病变定义,包括炎症性病变(即滑膜肥厚[SH]、关节积液[JE]、能量多普勒信号[PD])和结构异常(即软骨损伤[CD]和骨赘)。随后,在静态图像和现场运动中测试了 US 评估上述病变的可靠性。可靠性通过kappa 分析和二分类和有序分类的调整后偏倚kappa(PABAK)进行评估。
通过二进制评分评估的 SH 和 JE 的观察者内和观察者间可靠性对于两个分量都是良好的,而 SH 的半定量评分的观察者内可靠性在基于网络的运动中为中度(PABAK 0.49),在现场运动中为良好(PABAK 0.8)。在所有运动中,CD 和 PD 评估的可靠性分别为良好和优秀(CD 的 PABAK 范围为 0.61 至 0.79,PD 的 PABAK 范围为 0.88 至 0.95)。在现场运动中,半定量评分的骨赘观察者间可靠性为一般(PABAK 0.36),在静态运动中为中度(PABAK 0.60)。
发现共识性 US 定义对于评估足部 OA 的炎症性病变是可靠的,而使用 US 评估结构损伤需要进一步研究。