NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre + (MUMC+), Department of Human Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042110. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
Differences in satiating capacity of liquid and solid meals are unclear.
Investigating appetite parameters, physiological measurements and within-subject relationships after consumption of a single macronutrient, subject-specific carbohydrate meal in liquefied versus solid form, controlled for energy density, weight and volume.
In a cross-over design, ten male subjects (age = 21.1±3.9 y, BMI = 22.4±1.2 kg/m(2)) consumed a solid (CS, whole peaches +750 ml water) and liquefied carbohydrate (CL, peach blended in 500 ml water +250 ml water) lunch. Appetite profiles, insulin-, glucose- and ghrelin concentrations were measured over three hours. Post-prandial relationships between appetite and blood parameters were calculated using subject-specific regression analyses.
Fullness ratings were higher in the CL (85±5 mm) compared to the CS condition (73±8 mm) at 20 min (p<0.03). Glucose concentrations peaked 20 to 30 min after the start of the lunch in the CL condition, and 30 to 40 min after start of the CS condition. Correspondingly, insulin concentrations were peaked at 20-30 min in the CL condition, and at 30-40 min in the CS condition. AUC or condition x time interactions were not different comparing the CL and the CS condition. Insulin was significantly higher in the CS compared to the CL condition 40 min after the start of the lunch (p<0.05). Fullness scores were significantly related to insulin concentrations but not to glucose concentrations; desire to eat scores were significantly associated with ghrelin concentrations in both, the CL and the CS condition. The relationship between fullness scores and glucose concentrations was not statistically significant.
Liquefied and solid carbohydrate meals do not differ in satiating capacity, supported by appetite profile and relevant blood parameters. Postprandially, fullness and desire to eat were associated with respectively insulin and ghrelin concentrations.
液体餐和固体餐的饱腹感差异尚不清楚。
研究在控制能量密度、重量和体积的情况下,以液化和固体形式摄入单一宏量营养素、个体特定碳水化合物餐(subject-specific carbohydrate meal)后的食欲参数、生理测量值和个体内关系。
在交叉设计中,10 名男性受试者(年龄=21.1±3.9 岁,BMI=22.4±1.2 kg/m²)摄入了固体(CS,整个桃子+750 ml 水)和液体碳水化合物(CL,桃泥混合在 500 ml 水中+250 ml 水)午餐。在三个小时内测量了食欲曲线、胰岛素、葡萄糖和胃饥饿素浓度。使用个体特定的回归分析计算餐后食欲和血液参数之间的关系。
在 20 分钟时,CL(85±5 mm)的饱腹感评分高于 CS 条件(73±8 mm)(p<0.03)。CL 条件下的葡萄糖浓度在午餐开始后 20 至 30 分钟达到峰值,而 CS 条件下的葡萄糖浓度在午餐开始后 30 至 40 分钟达到峰值。相应地,CL 条件下的胰岛素浓度在 20-30 分钟达到峰值,CS 条件下的胰岛素浓度在 30-40 分钟达到峰值。比较 CL 和 CS 条件时,AUC 或条件 x 时间的相互作用没有差异。午餐开始后 40 分钟,CS 条件下的胰岛素显著高于 CL 条件(p<0.05)。饱腹感评分与胰岛素浓度显著相关,但与葡萄糖浓度无关;在 CL 和 CS 条件下,食欲评分与胃饥饿素浓度显著相关。饱腹感评分与葡萄糖浓度之间的关系没有统计学意义。
液化和固体碳水化合物餐在饱腹感方面没有差异,这得到了食欲曲线和相关血液参数的支持。餐后,饱腹感和食欲与胰岛素和胃饥饿素浓度分别相关。