• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用拉施一维测量模型构建量表:青少年对堕胎态度的测量。

Scale construction utilising the Rasch unidimensional measurement model: A measurement of adolescent attitudes towards abortion.

作者信息

Hendriks Jacqueline, Fyfe Sue, Styles Irene, Skinner S Rachel, Merriman Gareth

机构信息

School of Public Health, Curtin University, Australia.

出版信息

Australas Med J. 2012;5(5):251-61. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2012.952. Epub 2012 May 31.

DOI:10.4066/AMJ.2012.952
PMID:22848320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3395283/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measurement scales seeking to quantify latent traits like attitudes, are often developed using traditional psychometric approaches. Application of the Rasch unidimensional measurement model may complement or replace these techniques, as the model can be used to construct scales and check their psychometric properties. If data fit the model, then a scale with invariant measurement properties, including interval-level scores, will have been developed.

AIMS

This paper highlights the unique properties of the Rasch model. Items developed to measure adolescent attitudes towards abortion are used to exemplify the process.

METHOD

Ten attitude and intention items relating to abortion were answered by 406 adolescents aged 12 to 19 years, as part of the "Teen Relationships Study". The sampling framework captured a range of sexual and pregnancy experiences. Items were assessed for fit to the Rasch model including checks for Differential Item Functioning (DIF) by gender, sexual experience or pregnancy experience.

RESULTS

Rasch analysis of the original dataset initially demonstrated that some items did not fit the model. Rescoring of one item (B5) and removal of another (L31) resulted in fit, as shown by a non-significant item-trait interaction total chi-square and a mean log residual fit statistic for items of -0.05 (SD=1.43). No DIF existed for the revised scale. However, items did not distinguish as well amongst persons with the most intense attitudes as they did for other persons. A person separation index of 0.82 indicated good reliability.

CONCLUSION

Application of the Rasch model produced a valid and reliable scale measuring adolescent attitudes towards abortion, with stable measurement properties. The Rasch process provided an extensive range of diagnostic information concerning item and person fit, enabling changes to be made to scale items. This example shows the value of the Rasch model in developing scales for both social science and health disciplines.

摘要

背景

旨在量化态度等潜在特质的测量量表通常采用传统心理测量方法来编制。拉施单维测量模型的应用可以补充或取代这些技术,因为该模型可用于构建量表并检验其心理测量特性。如果数据符合该模型,那么就会开发出一个具有不变测量特性(包括区间水平分数)的量表。

目的

本文强调拉施模型的独特特性。以测量青少年对堕胎态度所编制的项目为例来说明这一过程。

方法

作为“青少年关系研究”的一部分,406名12至19岁的青少年回答了与堕胎相关的10个态度和意向项目。抽样框架涵盖了一系列性经历和怀孕经历。对项目进行评估以确定其是否符合拉施模型,包括检查按性别、性经历或怀孕经历的项目功能差异(DIF)。

结果

对原始数据集的拉施分析最初表明,一些项目不符合该模型。对一个项目(B5)重新计分并删除另一个项目(L31)后实现了拟合,如项目 - 特质交互总卡方不显著以及项目的平均对数残差拟合统计量为 -0.05(标准差 = 1.43)所示。修订后的量表不存在DIF。然而,项目在态度最强烈的人群中区分度不如在其他人群中。个人分离指数为0.82表明可靠性良好。

结论

拉施模型的应用产生了一个有效且可靠的量表,用于测量青少年对堕胎的态度,具有稳定的测量特性。拉施过程提供了有关项目和个人拟合的广泛诊断信息,从而能够对量表项目进行调整。这个例子展示了拉施模型在为社会科学和健康学科编制量表方面的价值。

相似文献

1
Scale construction utilising the Rasch unidimensional measurement model: A measurement of adolescent attitudes towards abortion.利用拉施一维测量模型构建量表:青少年对堕胎态度的测量。
Australas Med J. 2012;5(5):251-61. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2012.952. Epub 2012 May 31.
2
Rasch analysis of the Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes towards Children with Handicaps scale.对切多克-麦克马斯特儿童残疾态度量表的拉施分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Feb;39(3):281-290. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1140833. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Application of Rasch Analysis to the Evaluation of the Measurement Properties of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly.应用 Rasch 分析评价老年听力障碍量表的测量性能。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1125-1134. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000832.
4
Applying modern measurement approaches to constructs relevant to evidence-based practice among Canadian physical and occupational therapists.将现代测量方法应用于加拿大物理治疗师和职业治疗师循证实践相关的构建。
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 18;13(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0844-4.
5
Evaluation of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析评估爱丁堡产后抑郁量表
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 12;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-28.
6
Rasch analysis resulted in an improved Norwegian version of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS).拉施分析得出了改进后的挪威版疼痛态度和信念量表(PABS)。
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
7
Evaluation of the internal construct validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析评估个人护理参与评估与资源工具(PC-PART)的内部结构效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 5;14:543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0543-z.
8
The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure.足部姿势指数:一种新型足部特异性结局指标的拉施分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;88(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.005.
9
Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.患者激活度量表(PAM)是否能有效测量骨关节炎自我管理的态度和能力?一项 Rasch 分析的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 5;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01364-6.
10
Rasch analysis of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire.患者自评腕关节评估问卷的拉施分析
Arch Physiother. 2018 Feb 26;8:5. doi: 10.1186/s40945-018-0046-z. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
A COSMIN Systematic Review of Sexual Health Literacy Self-Report Measures for Adolescents.青少年性健康素养自我报告测量的COSMIN系统评价
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 May;54(5):1737-1768. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03142-1. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
2
Development and Validation of the Jawline Subject Satisfaction Scale.下颌轮廓主观满意度量表的开发与验证
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 May 13:22925503241249757. doi: 10.1177/22925503241249757.
3
The Legality of Labor and Perceptions of Deservingness of Rights and Services for Sex Workers.性工作者的劳动合法性和权利与服务应得感的认知。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Oct;53(9):3609-3624. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02951-0. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
4
Validation of a new glucocorticoid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire (the Steroid PRO).验证一种新的糖皮质激素特异性患者报告结局问卷(Steroid PRO)。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Feb 15;83(3):394-400. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224946.
5
Rasch analyses of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report in neurodegenerative and major depressive disorders.神经退行性疾病和重度抑郁症中抑郁症状快速自评量表的拉施分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 2;14:1154519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1154519. eCollection 2023.
6
A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory.运用经典测试理论和项目反应理论对中国慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染相关耻辱感量表进行心理测量学评估。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1035071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035071. eCollection 2023.
7
Design and study of psychometric properties of the Community Attitude to Abortion Scale (CAAS) with the Chilean population: Autonomy and Stigma.智利人群对堕胎态度量表(CAAS)的心理测量学特性的设计与研究:自主性与污名化
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 23;13:1008492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008492. eCollection 2022.
8
Rasch analysis and differential item functioning of English language anxiety scale (ELAS) across sex in Egyptian context.拉什分析和英语语言焦虑量表(ELAS)在埃及语境下的性别差异项目功能。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Oct 31;10(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00955-w.
9
Measurement Properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire in the Understanding Multiple Sclerosis Massive Open Online Course Cohort: A Rasch Analysis.健康素养问卷在多发性硬化症大规模开放式在线课程队列中的测量特性:Rasch 分析。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jul;6(3):e200-e212. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220720-01. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
10
Adaptation and validation of a computer-assisted language learning attitude questionnaire in a Vietnamese EFL context: A comparison between online and paper modes of administration.越南英语外语环境下计算机辅助语言学习态度问卷的改编与验证:在线与纸质施测模式的比较
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 16;8(6):e09743. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09743. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Rasch analysis on OSCE data : An illustrative example.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)数据的拉施分析:一个示例
Australas Med J. 2011;4(6):339-45. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.755. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.在拉施测量中评估适配度的家族方法。
J Appl Meas. 2009;10(4):424-37.
3
A rasch analysis of the Manchester foot pain and disability index.曼彻斯特足部疼痛和残疾指数的 Rasch 分析。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2009 Oct 30;2:29. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-29.
4
Pregnancy and protection: perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Australian female adolescents.怀孕与保护:澳大利亚女性青少年的认知、态度及经历
Women Birth. 2009 Jun;22(2):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2008.12.001.
5
Perceptions and experiences of first sexual intercourse in Australian adolescent females.澳大利亚青春期女性首次性行为的认知与经历
J Adolesc Health. 2008 Dec;43(6):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
6
The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?风湿病学中的拉施测量模型:它是什么以及为何使用它?何时应应用该模型,在一篇拉施模型论文中应关注哪些方面?
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1358-62. doi: 10.1002/art.23108.
7
Evaluation of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析评估爱丁堡产后抑郁量表
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 12;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-28.
8
An analysis of dimensionality using factor analysis (true-score theory) and Rasch measurement: what is the difference? Which method is better?使用因子分析(真分数理论)和拉施测量法进行维度分析:有何差异?哪种方法更好?
J Appl Meas. 2005;6(1):80-99.
9
Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms?争议与拉施模型:不相容范式的一个特征?
Med Care. 2004 Jan;42(1 Suppl):I7-16. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103528.48582.7c.
10
The General Health Questionnaire: a psychometric analysis using latent trait theory.一般健康问卷:基于潜在特质理论的心理测量分析
Psychol Med. 1989 May;19(2):469-85. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700012502.