Suppr超能文献

尿路改道类型是否影响远端尿道下裂修复的结果?一项前瞻性随机试验。

Does the type of urinary diversion affect the result of distal hypospadias repair? A prospective randomized trial.

机构信息

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypyt.

出版信息

Ther Adv Urol. 2012 Aug;4(4):161-5. doi: 10.1177/1756287212448111.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to evaluate different techniques in urinary diversion and urethral stenting in hypospadias surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The surgical procedure included 192 tubularized incised plate (TIP) repairs for distal penile hypospadias. The patients were prospectively randomized into three groups: In group A, a urethral catheter was used as a stent and for diversion of urine (63 patients); in group B we use no urethral stenting (63 patients), only a suprapubic catheter; and in group C we use a suprapubic diversion and we put a small catheter in the anterior urethra only (66 patients). The urethral catheter was removed in group A at the 6th-7th postoperative day and in group C the urethral stent was removed at the 3rd-4th postoperative day. The suprapubic catheter was removed in both groups B and C at the 7th-9th postoperative day. All patients received an injection of antibiotics in the morning of the operation and daily until the day of catheter removal. All of the operations were performed by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

The mean ages of our patients were 3, 5, and 5 years in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 5 days (3-8). Follow-up ranged from 8 to 48 months (mean of 21.5 ± 10.1 months). Bladder spasm was observed in 33% of our patients in group A while there were no cases of spasm in the other two groups with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Fistula was reported in eight patients (12.7%) of our urethral catheter group A, while it was observed in three patients (2.3%) of our suprapubic diversion groups B and C with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Meatal stenosis was reported in eight patients in group B (12.7%; nonstented group) versus three patients of both groups A and C (2.4%; stented groups) with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Suprapubic diversion is an important step in hypospadias repair as it provides a better success rate with a significantly lower rate of occurrence of fistula. However, the addition of a stent in the anterior urethra to suprapubic diversion avoids the development of meatal stenosis and also avoids the bladder spasm observed with a urethral catheter.

摘要

目的

本次综述的目的是评估尿道下裂手术中不同的尿流改道术和尿道支架置入术技术。

患者和方法

手术过程包括 192 例远端阴茎型尿道下裂的管状切开板(TIP)修复术。患者前瞻性随机分为三组:A 组使用尿道导管作为支架和导尿管(63 例);B 组不使用尿道支架(63 例),仅使用耻骨上导管;C 组使用耻骨上引流,并在前尿道中仅置入小导管(66 例)。A 组的尿道导管在术后第 6-7 天取出,C 组的尿道支架在术后第 3-4 天取出。B 组和 C 组的耻骨上导管均在术后第 7-9 天取出。所有患者在手术当天早上和直至导管取出当天每天接受抗生素注射。所有手术均由同一位外科医生完成。

结果

A、B 和 C 组患者的平均年龄分别为 3、5 和 5 岁。平均住院时间为 5 天(3-8 天)。随访时间为 8-48 个月(平均 21.5±10.1 个月)。A 组有 33%的患者出现膀胱痉挛,而其他两组均无痉挛,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。A 组有 8 例(12.7%)患者出现尿道导管组瘘,B 组和 C 组的耻骨上引流组各有 3 例(2.3%)患者出现瘘,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。B 组有 8 例(12.7%;未支架组)患者出现尿道口狭窄,A 组和 C 组各有 3 例(2.4%;支架组)患者出现尿道口狭窄,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。

结论

耻骨上引流是尿道下裂修复的重要步骤,因为它能提高成功率,并显著降低瘘的发生率。然而,在前尿道中置入支架以辅助耻骨上引流可避免尿道口狭窄的发生,同时也可避免尿道导管引起的膀胱痉挛。

相似文献

2
A Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Hypospadias Surgery Following Early Versus Late Bladder Catheter Removal.
Cureus. 2022 Jun 20;14(6):e26104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26104. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Outcome analysis of tubularized incised plate repair in hypospadias: is a catheter necessary?
Urol Int. 2013;90(3):354-7. doi: 10.1159/000347127. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
6
Tubularized-incised urethral plate urethroplasty: is regular dilatation necessary for success?
BJU Int. 1999 Oct;84(6):683-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00207.x.
7
One-stage hypospadias repair with stent or suprapubic diversion: which is better?
J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Dec;32(12):1711-2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90511-x.
8
Investigation of factors affecting result of distal hypospadias repair: comparison of two techniques.
Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.090. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
9
10
The midterm success rates of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in reoperative patients with distal or midpenile hypospadias.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2005 Dec;21(12):973-6. doi: 10.1007/s00383-005-1555-x. Epub 2005 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Stent-free tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair of distal and mid-shaft hypospadias irrespective of age.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;21(3):168-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270457. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
4
5
Healing of unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: an experimental study in a rabbit model.
BJU Int. 2003 Jan;91(1):84-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.03084.x.
6
Distal hypospadias: which repair?
BJU Int. 2002 Jul;90(1):88-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02828.x.
7
Further experience with the tubularized-incised urethral plate technique for hypospadias repair.
BJU Int. 2002 Feb;89(3):291-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01525.x.
9
Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: expanded use in primary and repeat surgery for hypospadias.
J Urol. 2001 Feb;165(2):581-5. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200102000-00075.
10
Mathieu hypospadias repair: experience in 202 patients.
J Urol. 1999 Dec;162(6):2141-2; discussion 2142-3. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68143-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验