One-stage hypospadias repair with stent or suprapubic diversion: which is better?

PURPOSE

The authors report on 105 consecutive patients who underwent one-stage hypospadias repair based on use of suprapubic diversion or transurethral drainage with stenting.

METHODS

The surgical procedures included 52 metal-based flap urethroplasty (Mathieu) for coronal, subcoronal, and distal shaft hypospadias; 32 transverse island pedicle graft (Duckett) for mid and proximal shaft hypospadias; 21 transverse island pedicle (Duckett) plus rolled midline tube (Thierchs) for penoscrotal and scrotal hypospadias. To accomplish urinary drainage, suprapubic diversion (cystofix) was used in 28 of 52 Mathieu operations, in 17 of 32 Duckett operations, and in 11 of 21 transverse island pedicle graft plus rolled midline tube operations. In the rest of the cases, transurethral drainage with stenting was used.

RESULTS

All children had excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes. But the rates of complications such as fistula and meatal stenosis were significantly different between the groups in which suprapubic tube or urethral stent was used. In 56 of the 105 patients in whom suprapubic diversion was used, four (7.14%) had fistulas and three (5.35%) had meatal stenosis, in contrast to a fistula rate of 14.28% and meatal stenosis rate of 12.24% in patients that urethral stent is used for urinary drainage.

CONCLUSION

The authors believe that the use of suprapubic diversion is advantageous for the outcome of one-stage hypospadias repair in relation to fistula occurrence and meatal stenosis.