Office of Health Services Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea.
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):343-50. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238981.
The purpose of this paper is to present the role of social values in setting healthcare priorities in Korea.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using Clark and Weale's draft framework, Korean healthcare priority setting was analysed. The process values used were transparency, accountability, and participation, and the content values used were clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, justice/equity, solidarity and autonomy.
In the Korean health priority setting, it was found that multiple factors influence the decision-making process. Effectiveness and safety are the two most important values mentioned in the process. Cost-effectiveness is also considered in reimbursement decisions for new drugs since 2007. Recently, health technology assessment (HTA) has begun to change the social value system traditionally used in the Korean healthcare priority setting.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper extends understanding of health priority setting in Korea, and how the interpretation and use of social values has changed over recent years.
本文旨在介绍社会价值观在韩国医疗保健重点制定中的作用。
设计/方法/方法:使用克拉克和韦尔的草案框架,对韩国医疗保健重点制定进行了分析。使用的过程价值观是透明度、问责制和参与度,使用的内容价值观是临床效果、成本效果、公正/公平、团结和自主性。
在韩国的卫生重点制定中,发现有多种因素影响决策过程。有效性和安全性是决策过程中提到的两个最重要的价值。自 2007 年以来,新药物的报销决策中也考虑了成本效益。最近,卫生技术评估(HTA)开始改变韩国医疗保健重点制定中传统使用的社会价值体系。
原创性/价值:本文扩展了对韩国医疗保健重点制定的理解,以及社会价值观的解释和使用近年来如何发生变化。