• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Organizational values in the provision of access to care for the uninsured.为未参保者提供医疗服务过程中的组织价值观。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(4):240-250. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1170075. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
2
Healthcare resource allocation decisions affecting uninsured services.影响未参保服务的医疗资源分配决策。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Nov 21;30(8):1162-1182. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2016-0003.
3
Action Guide for Addressing Ethical Challenges of Resource Allocation Within Community-Based Healthcare Organizations.应对社区医疗保健组织内资源分配伦理挑战的行动指南。
J Clin Ethics. 2018 Summer;29(2):124-138.
4
Should "standard gamble" and "'time trade off" utility measurement be used more in mental health research?“标准博弈”和“时间权衡”效用测量是否应在心理健康研究中得到更多应用?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):65-72.
5
Is there an association between local health department organizational and administrative factors and childhood immunization coverage rates?当地卫生部门的组织和管理因素与儿童免疫接种覆盖率之间是否存在关联?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2012 Spring;34(4):418-55.
6
Healthcare organizational change: implications for access to care and its measurement.医疗保健组织变革:对医疗服务可及性及其衡量的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Aug;33(3 Pt 2):653-80; discussion 681-4.
7
Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.优先级设定与心脏手术:一项定性案例研究
Health Policy. 2007 Mar;80(3):444-58. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
8
Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.两种医疗保健系统中的残疾状况:有残疾的加拿大和美国工作年龄人群在获得医疗服务、医疗质量、满意度和医生接触方面的情况。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Oct;1(4):196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.006.
9
Intrasectoral variation in mission and values: the case of the Catholic health systems.部门内部使命与价值观的差异:以天主教医疗系统为例。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):68-79. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342982.14802.47.
10
The changing nature of nursing work in rural and small community hospitals.农村及小型社区医院护理工作性质的变化
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Jan-Mar;9(1):1089. Epub 2009 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Ready, Set, Sort! A User-Guide to Card Sorts for Community-Engaged Empirical Bioethics.准备、设定、分类!参与式社区经验生物伦理学卡片分类用户指南。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2024 Oct;19(4-5):186-196. doi: 10.1177/15562646241281802. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
General orders for the embedded researcher: Moorings for a developing profession.嵌入式研究人员的一般指令:为一个不断发展的职业提供支撑
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Dec 22;5(4):e10254. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10254. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Infringement of the right to surgical informed consent: negligent disclosure and its impact on patient trust in surgeons at public general hospitals - the voice of the patient.侵犯手术知情同意权:疏忽披露及其对公立医院外科医生的患者信任的影响——患者的声音。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 28;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0407-5.
4
Action Guide for Addressing Ethical Challenges of Resource Allocation Within Community-Based Healthcare Organizations.应对社区医疗保健组织内资源分配伦理挑战的行动指南。
J Clin Ethics. 2018 Summer;29(2):124-138.
5
Healthcare resource allocation decisions affecting uninsured services.影响未参保服务的医疗资源分配决策。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Nov 21;30(8):1162-1182. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2016-0003.

本文引用的文献

1
Building an ethical organizational culture.构建道德的组织文化。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014 Apr-Jun;33(2):158-64. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000008.
2
Consideration of social values in the establishment of accountable care organizations in the USA.美国建立问责制医疗照顾组织时对社会价值的考虑。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):384-9. doi: 10.1108/14777261211239025.
3
Social values and health priority setting in Germany.德国的社会价值观和卫生重点制定。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):374-83. doi: 10.1108/14777261211239016.
4
Social values and health priority setting in England: "values" based decision making.英格兰的社会价值观和卫生重点制定:基于“价值观”的决策。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):363-73. doi: 10.1108/14777261211239007.
5
Social values and health priority setting in China.中国的社会价值观和卫生重点制定。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):351-62. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238990.
6
Social values and healthcare priority setting in Korea.韩国的社会价值观与医疗保健重点制定。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):343-50. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238981.
7
Efficiency or equity: value judgments in coverage decisions in Thailand.效率还是公平:泰国覆盖决策中的价值判断。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):331-42. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238972.
8
Social value judgments in healthcare: a philosophical critique.医疗保健中的社会价值判断:哲学批判。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):317-30. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238963.
9
Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework.卫生优先级设定中的社会价值:概念框架。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):293-316. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238954.
10
Social values and health policy: a new international research programme.社会价值与健康政策:一项新的国际研究计划。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):285-92. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238945.

为未参保者提供医疗服务过程中的组织价值观。

Organizational values in the provision of access to care for the uninsured.

作者信息

Harrison Krista Lyn, Taylor Holly A

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University.

出版信息

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(4):240-250. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1170075. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1080/23294515.2016.1170075
PMID:28781981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5540336/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For the last 20 years, health provider organizations have made efforts to align mission, values, and everyday practices to ensure high-quality, high-value, and ethical care. However, little attention has been paid to the organizational values and practices of community-based programs that organize and facilitate access to care for uninsured populations. This study aimed to identify and describe organizational values relevant to resource allocation and policy decisions that affect the services offered to members, using the case of community access programs: county-based programs that provide access to care for the uninsured working poor.

METHODS

Comparative and qualitative case study methodology was used, including document review, observations, and key informant interviews, at two geographically diverse programs.

RESULTS

Nine values were identified as relevant to decision making: stewardship, quality care, access to care, service to others, community well-being, member independence, organizational excellence, decency, and fairness. The way these values were deployed in resource allocation decisions that affected services offered to the uninsured are illustrated in one example per site.

CONCLUSIONS

This study addresses the previous dearth in the literature regarding an empirical description of organizational values employed in decision making of community organizations. To assess the transferability of the values identified, we compared our empirical results to prior empirical and conceptual work in the United States and internationally and found substantial alignment. Future studies can examine whether the identified organizational values are reflective of those at other health care organizations.

摘要

背景

在过去20年里,医疗服务提供机构一直在努力使使命、价值观和日常实践保持一致,以确保提供高质量、高价值且符合道德规范的医疗服务。然而,对于那些为未参保人群组织并促进其获得医疗服务的社区项目的组织价值观和实践,却很少有人关注。本研究旨在以社区接入项目为例,识别并描述与资源分配及政策决策相关的组织价值观,这些决策会影响向成员提供的服务,社区接入项目是指那些为未参保的在职贫困人口提供医疗服务的县级项目。

方法

采用比较性和定性的案例研究方法,包括对两个地理位置不同的项目进行文件审查、观察和关键信息人访谈。

结果

确定了九个与决策相关的价值观:管理、优质医疗、医疗服务可及性、为他人服务、社区福祉、成员独立性、组织卓越性、得体和公平。每个站点都通过一个例子说明了这些价值观在影响向未参保者提供服务的资源分配决策中的应用方式。

结论

本研究弥补了以往文献中关于对社区组织决策中所采用的组织价值观进行实证描述的不足。为了评估所确定价值观的可转移性,我们将实证结果与美国及国际上先前的实证和概念性研究进行了比较,发现有很大的一致性。未来的研究可以考察所确定的组织价值观是否反映了其他医疗保健组织的价值观。