Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Political Science, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria.
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Mar 18;33(1):18-34. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0065. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
In order to create sustainable health systems, many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services underpinned by a process of health technology assessment. While this approach requires technical judgements of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness, these are embedded in a wider set of social (societal) value judgements, including fairness, responsiveness to need, non-discrimination and obligations of accountability and transparency. Implementing controversial decisions faces legal, political and public challenge. To help generate acceptance for the need for health prioritisation and the resulting decisions, the purpose of this paper is to develop a novel way of encouraging key stakeholders, especially patients and the public, to become involved in the prioritisation process.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Through a multidisciplinary collaboration involving a series of international workshops, ethical and political theory (including accountability for reasonableness) have been applied to develop a practical way forward through the creation of a values framework. The authors have tested this framework in England and in New Zealand using a mixed-methods approach.
A social values framework that consists of content and process values has been developed and converted into an online decision-making audit tool.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The authors have developed an easy to use method to help stakeholders (including the public) to understand the need for prioritisation of health services and to encourage their involvement. It provides a pragmatic way of harmonising different perspectives aimed at maximising health experience.
All health care systems are facing increasing demands within finite resources. Although many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services, the decisions often face legal, political, commercial and ethical challenge. The research will help health systems to respond to these challenges.
This study helps in increasing public involvement in complex health challenges.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: No other groups have used this combination of approaches to address this issue.
为了创建可持续的卫生系统,许多国家正在引入基于卫生技术评估过程的卫生服务优先级排序方法。虽然这种方法需要对临床有效性和成本效益进行技术判断,但这些判断嵌入在更广泛的社会(社会)价值判断中,包括公平、对需求的响应、非歧视以及问责制和透明度的义务。实施有争议的决策面临法律、政治和公众的挑战。为了帮助人们接受卫生优先排序的必要性和由此产生的决策,本文旨在开发一种新的方法,鼓励主要利益相关者,特别是患者和公众,参与到优先排序过程中。
设计/方法/方法:通过涉及一系列国际研讨会的多学科合作,应用道德和政治理论(包括合理责任的问责制),开发了一种通过创建价值框架来推进的实用方法。作者使用混合方法在英格兰和新西兰测试了这个框架。
已经开发了一个由内容和过程价值组成的社会价值框架,并将其转化为在线决策审计工具。
研究局限性/影响:作者已经开发出一种易于使用的方法,可以帮助利益相关者(包括公众)理解卫生服务优先级排序的必要性,并鼓励他们的参与。它提供了一种协调不同观点的务实方法,旨在最大限度地提高健康体验。
所有的卫生保健系统都在有限的资源内面临着越来越多的需求。尽管许多国家都在引入卫生服务优先级排序的方法,但这些决策往往面临法律、政治、商业和伦理方面的挑战。这项研究将帮助卫生系统应对这些挑战。
这项研究有助于增加公众对复杂健康挑战的参与。
原创性/价值:没有其他团体使用这种方法来解决这个问题。