• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年是蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后不良的预测指标,其与入院时脑积水的相互作用可导致预后不良。

Elderly age as a prognostic marker of 1-year poor outcome for subarachnoid hemorrhage patients through its interaction with admission hydrocephalus.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2012 Dec;117(6):1289-99. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318267395b.

DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318267395b
PMID:22854979
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of elderly patients are treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Given that elderly age is associated with both poor outcome and an increased risk of hydrocephalus, we sought to investigate the interaction between age and hydrocephalus in outcome prediction.

METHODS

We enrolled 933 consecutive patients treated for subarachnoid hemorrhage between 2002 and 2010 and followed them for 1 yr after intensive care unit discharge. We first performed stepwise analyses to determine the relationship among neurologic events, elderly age (60 or more yr old), and 1-yr poor outcome (defined as Rankin 4-6). Within the most parsimonious model, we then tested for interaction between admission hydrocephalus and elderly age. Finally, we tested the association between age as a stratified variable and 1-yr poor outcome for each subgroup of patients with neurologic events.

RESULTS

24.1% (n=225) of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were 60 yr old or more and 19.3% (n=180) had 1-yr poor outcomes. In the most parsimonious model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.88; P<0.001), elderly age and admission hydrocephalus were two independent predictors for 1-yr outcome (P<0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). Including the significant interaction between age and hydrocephalus (P=0.04) improved the model's outcome prediction (P=0.03), but elderly age was no longer a significant predictor. Finally, stratified age was associated with 1-yr poor outcome for hydrocephalus patients (P=0.007), but not for patients without hydrocephalus (P=0.87).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, elderly age and admission hydrocephalus predicted poor outcome, but elderly age without hydrocephalus did not. An external validation, however, will be needed to generalize this finding.

摘要

背景

越来越多的老年患者接受了颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的治疗。鉴于老年与不良预后和脑积水风险增加相关,我们试图研究年龄与预后的相关性。

方法

我们纳入了 2002 年至 2010 年间连续接受治疗的 933 例蛛网膜下腔出血患者,并在重症监护病房出院后随访 1 年。我们首先进行逐步分析,以确定神经事件、老年(60 岁或以上)和 1 年预后不良(定义为 Rankin 4-6)之间的关系。在最简洁的模型中,我们然后测试了入院时脑积水和老年年龄之间的相互作用。最后,我们测试了年龄作为分层变量与有神经事件的每个亚组患者的 1 年预后不良之间的关联。

结果

24.1%(n=225)的蛛网膜下腔出血患者年龄在 60 岁或以上,19.3%(n=180)有 1 年预后不良。在最简洁的模型中(接收者操作特征曲线下面积,0.84;95%CI:0.82 至 0.88;P<0.001),老年和入院时脑积水是 1 年预后的两个独立预测因素(P<0.001 和 P=0.004)。包括年龄和脑积水之间的显著相互作用(P=0.04)提高了模型的预后预测(P=0.03),但老年不再是一个显著的预测因素。最后,分层年龄与脑积水患者的 1 年预后不良相关(P=0.007),但与无脑积水患者无关(P=0.87)。

结论

在这项观察性研究中,老年和入院时的脑积水预测了不良预后,但没有脑积水的老年患者则不然。然而,需要进行外部验证才能推广这一发现。

相似文献

1
Elderly age as a prognostic marker of 1-year poor outcome for subarachnoid hemorrhage patients through its interaction with admission hydrocephalus.老年是蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后不良的预测指标,其与入院时脑积水的相互作用可导致预后不良。
Anesthesiology. 2012 Dec;117(6):1289-99. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318267395b.
2
Preoperative prediction of long-term outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.低级别动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血长期预后的术前预测
Neurosurgery. 2006 Sep;59(3):529-38; discussion 529-38. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000228680.22550.A2.
3
S100B as an additional prognostic marker in subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage.S100B作为蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤性出血的一种额外预后标志物。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2267-73. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181809750.
4
The postoperative C-reactive protein level can be a useful prognostic factor for poor outcome and symptomatic vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.术后 C 反应蛋白水平可作为预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者不良预后和症状性血管痉挛的有用预后因素。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012 Oct;24(4):317-24. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31826047a2.
5
Discriminant analysis prediction of the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt after subarachnoid hemorrhage.鉴别分析预测蛛网膜下腔出血后脑-腹腔分流术的需求。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Aug;21(6):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.11.010. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
6
Timing of aneurysm surgery in subarachnoid haemorrhage--an observational study in The Netherlands.蛛网膜下腔出血时动脉瘤手术的时机——荷兰的一项观察性研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Aug;147(8):815-21. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0536-0. Epub 2005 Jun 16.
7
Fever burden and functional recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血后的发热负担与功能恢复
Neurosurgery. 2008 Aug;63(2):212-7; discussion 217-8. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000320453.61270.0F.
8
Subarachnoid hemorrhage in elderly: advantages of the endovascular treatment.老年患者的蛛网膜下腔出血:血管内治疗的优势。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012 Jan;12(1):46-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00725.x. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
9
The impact of microsurgical fenestration of the lamina terminalis on shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.终板显微开窗术对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后分流依赖性脑积水和血管痉挛的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2008 Jan;62(1):123-32; discussion 132-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000311069.48862.C8.
10
Surgical management of ruptured aneurysms in the eighth and ninth decades.八九十岁患者破裂动脉瘤的手术治疗
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003 Jun;145(6):439-45; discussion 445. doi: 10.1007/s00701-003-0037-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes for older patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage who require admission to an Australian intensive care unit.需要入住澳大利亚重症监护病房的老年蛛网膜下腔出血患者的治疗结果。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Dec 2;26(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/17511437241301916. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Clipping and coiling of intracranial aneurysms in the elderly patients: clinical features and treatment outcomes.老年患者颅内动脉瘤的夹闭术和弹簧圈栓塞术:临床特征与治疗结果
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 10;14:1282683. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1282683. eCollection 2023.
3
Effects of frailty on postoperative clinical outcomes of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: results from the National Inpatient Sample database.
衰弱对颅内破裂动脉瘤患者术后临床结局的影响:来自国家住院患者样本数据库的研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 28;22(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03141-0.
4
Methodological quality of multivariate prognostic models for intracranial haemorrhages in intensive care units: a systematic review.方法学质量的多变量预后模型颅内出血的重症监护病房:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 21;11(9):e047279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047279.
5
Higher Serum Levels of Lactate Dehydrogenase Before Microsurgery Predict Poor Outcome of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.显微手术前血清乳酸脱氢酶水平较高预示动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后不良。
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 12;12:720574. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.720574. eCollection 2021.
6
Neurointensive care results and risk factors for unfavorable outcome in aneurysmatic SAH: a comparison of two age groups.神经重症监护结果和影响动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血不良预后的危险因素:两个年龄组的比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1469-1478. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04731-4. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Influence of Age-Related Complications on Clinical Outcome in Patients With Small Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms.年龄相关并发症对小型破裂脑动脉瘤患者临床结局的影响。
Front Neurol. 2020 Mar 5;11:131. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00131. eCollection 2020.
8
Return to work after subarachnoid hemorrhage: The influence of cognitive deficits.蛛网膜下腔出血后重返工作岗位:认知缺陷的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 9;14(8):e0220972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220972. eCollection 2019.
9
Early blood-brain barrier dysfunction predicts neurological outcome following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.早期血脑屏障功能障碍预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后的神经功能结局。
EBioMedicine. 2019 May;43:460-472. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.054.
10
Does Neurosurgical Clipping or Endovascular Coiling Lead to More Cases of Delayed Hydrocephalus in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage?对于蛛网膜下腔出血患者,神经外科夹闭术或血管内栓塞术哪种会导致更多延迟性脑积水病例?
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;20(2):87-95. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2018.20.2.87. Epub 2018 Jun 30.