Centro de Control de Cancer, Bogota DC, Colombia.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2012 Oct;14(10):747-54. doi: 10.1007/s12094-012-0862-7. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
Pectus excavatum is a frequent anomaly. It represents a challenge for adjuvant radiotherapy in the conservative treatment of breast cancer. Primary objective of this study is to compare dosimetric outcomes, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and integral dose using four radiation techniques. Secondary objective is to describe acute toxicity and setup errors.
A 57-year-old female patient with an inner quadrant, left breast, ductal carcinoma in situ, was identified. Whole breast was prescribed with 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Boost planning target volume (PTV) was prescribed with 60 Gy in 30 fractions for sequential boost (SB) plans or 57.5 Gy in 25 fractions in the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) plan. All plans were normalized to deliver 47.5 Gy to 95 % of the breast PTV. Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) was performed. Setup deviations were described.
Constraints were not accomplished for heart when using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) + SB or conformal radiotherapy with three photon fields and SB. Left lung constraint was not achieved by any of the techniques in comparison. IMRT + SIB and conformal photons and electrons + SB plan were closer to the objective. Integral doses were lower with IMRT for heart and ipsilateral lung; however, it were higher for contralateral breast and lung. Coverage and tumoral conformity indexes were similar for all techniques in comparison. Greater inhomogeneity was observed with the photons and electrons + SB. IMRT + SIB treatment was administered daily with grade I skin toxicity. The highest setup error was observed in Y direction.
Planning target volume coverage was similar with the four techniques. Homogeneity was superior with both IMRT plans. A good balance between dose constraints for organs at risk, PTV coverage, homogeneity, and NTCP was observed with IMRT + SIB. The documented daily setup error justifies the use of online IGRT.
漏斗胸是一种常见的异常。它代表了乳腺癌保守治疗中辅助放疗的一个挑战。本研究的主要目的是比较四种放射技术的剂量学结果、正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)和积分剂量。次要目标是描述急性毒性和设置误差。
我们选择了一位 57 岁的女性患者,她患有左乳腺内象限、导管原位癌。全乳被规定接受 50 Gy/25 次分割照射。序贯推量(SB)计划的推量计划靶区(PTV)规定接受 60 Gy/30 次分割照射,同时整合推量(SIB)计划规定接受 57.5 Gy/25 次分割照射。所有计划均归一化为使 95%的乳腺 PTV 接受 47.5 Gy 照射。每天进行图像引导放疗(IGRT)。描述了设置偏差。
在使用调强放疗(IMRT)+SB 或三光子野的适形放疗+SB 时,心脏的限制无法满足。与其他技术相比,任何技术都无法达到左肺的限制。IMRT+SIB 和适形光子和电子+SB 计划更接近目标。与其他技术相比,IMRT 使心脏和同侧肺的积分剂量更低;然而,对对侧乳腺和肺的积分剂量更高。所有技术的覆盖和肿瘤适形指数相似。光子和电子+SB 的不均匀性更高。IMRT+SIB 每日进行皮肤毒性 I 级治疗。在 Y 方向观察到最大的设置误差。
四种技术的靶区覆盖相似。两种 IMRT 计划的均匀性更好。IMRT+SIB 观察到危及器官剂量限制、PTV 覆盖、均匀性和 NTCP 之间的良好平衡。记录的每日设置误差证明了在线 IGRT 的使用是合理的。