• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无牙颌患者的首选标准治疗方法:美国学术修复专家的 Delphi 方法调查。

The first-choice standard of care for an edentulous mandible: a Delphi method survey of academic prosthodontists in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York City, , NY 11220, USA.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Aug;143(8):881-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0292.

DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0292
PMID:22855902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2002 and 2009, two consensus statements-one from a symposium in Canada and one from England-were issued that recommended that the first-choice standard of care for an edentulous mandible should be the two implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IRMOD). The authors conducted a survey to determine if, in 2011, U.S. academic prosthodontic experts' opinions were aligned with those in the two consensus statements.

METHODS

The authors administered a Delphi method survey to an expert panel of 16 nationally representative academic prosthodontists to determine if there is consensus on the first-choice standard of care for an edentulous mandible between the IRMOD and a conventional mandibular complete denture (CD). Consensus agreement was defined as a 70 percent agreement level among the panelists.

RESULTS

The panel attained consensus favoring the IRMOD for nine of the 10 parameters assessed-retention, stability, speech, masticatory efficiency, comfort while eating soft foods and hard foods, confidence in intimate situations, satisfaction and self-esteem. The exception was esthetics for which only a majority (51-69 percent) favored the IRMOD.

CONCLUSIONS

The panelists reached consensus that they would recommend an IRMOD instead of a CD as the first-choice standard of care for patients who are healthy or have mild systemic disease, but not for patients with severe systemic disease.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Surveyed academic prosthodontists recommend an IRMOD as the first choice standard of care when restoring an edentulous mandible of a healthy patient or a patient with mild systemic disease.

摘要

背景

2002 年和 2009 年,加拿大和英国分别发布了两项共识声明,建议无牙下颌的首选标准治疗方法应为两个种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿(IRMOD)。作者进行了一项调查,以确定 2011 年美国学术性修复专家的观点是否与这两项共识声明一致。

方法

作者对 16 名具有全国代表性的学术性修复专家进行了 Delphi 方法调查,以确定在无牙下颌的首选标准治疗方法中,IRMOD 与传统下颌全口义齿(CD)之间是否存在共识。共识协议定义为专家组中 70%的人达成一致。

结果

专家组就 10 个评估参数中的 9 个参数达成了支持 IROMD 的共识——保留、稳定性、言语、咀嚼效率、在吃软食和硬食时的舒适度、在亲密场合的信心、满意度和自尊心。唯一的例外是美观,只有多数(51-69%)人支持 IROMD。

结论

专家组达成共识,即他们将推荐 IROMD 而不是 CD 作为健康或轻度系统性疾病患者的首选标准治疗方法,但不推荐给患有严重系统性疾病的患者。

临床意义

接受调查的学术性修复专家建议在为健康患者或轻度系统性疾病患者修复无牙下颌时,将 IROMD 作为首选标准治疗方法。

相似文献

1
The first-choice standard of care for an edentulous mandible: a Delphi method survey of academic prosthodontists in the United States.无牙颌患者的首选标准治疗方法:美国学术修复专家的 Delphi 方法调查。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Aug;143(8):881-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0292.
2
Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.瑞典口腔修复医师在下颌无牙颌中使用种植体支持式修复体的情况。
Swed Dent J. 2014;38(4):161-7.
3
The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients.《麦吉尔覆盖义齿共识声明》。下颌两颗种植体支持的覆盖义齿作为无牙患者护理的首选标准。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2002 Sep;10(3):95-6.
4
Training needs for general dentistry residents to place and restore two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.普通牙科住院医师放置和修复两颗种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿的培训需求。
J Dent Educ. 2015 Jan;79(1):72-80.
5
Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.下颌种植覆盖义齿修复方式的随机、前瞻性临床评价
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jul;106(1):12-22. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60088-7.
6
An implant-supported, cobalt-chromium milled bar and nonflanged attachment-retained overdenture to rehabilitate the edentulous mandible.一种种植体支持的钴铬铣削杆和无翼附着体固位覆盖义齿,用于修复无牙下颌。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jul;102(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60096-2.
7
Two implant retained overdentures--a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements.两种种植体支持的覆盖义齿——支持麦吉尔和约克共识声明的文献回顾。
J Dent. 2012 Jan;40(1):22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
8
Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.三种种植体支持的固定义齿与两种种植体固位的覆盖义齿在下颌无牙颌中的疗效比较:一项治疗效果和患者满意度的初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):415-26.
9
Treatment options for the edentulous mandible: clinical application of the two-implant overdenture.无牙下颌的治疗选择:双种植体覆盖义齿的临床应用
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004 Mar;16(2):105-12; quiz 114.
10
Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part I.下颌种植体支持的覆盖义齿:附着系统、种植体数量及位置——第一部分
J Ir Dent Assoc. 2015 Apr-May;61(2):93-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Single versus two dental implants retained mandibular over dentures: comparison of function, patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life and success of treatment.单颗与两颗牙种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿:功能、患者满意度、口腔健康相关生活质量及治疗成功率的比较
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Dec 20;17(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-07040-y.
2
Hyoid displacement during swallowing function for completely edentulous subjects rehabilitated with mandibular implant retained overdenture.全口义齿患者下颌种植覆盖义齿修复后吞咽时舌骨位置的变化。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04616-9.
3
Accuracy of implant height and width measurement with triaxial rotation method based on cone-beam CT.
基于锥形束CT的三轴旋转法测量种植体高度和宽度的准确性
Heliyon. 2024 May 31;10(11):e32076. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32076. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
4
Comparison of the Quality of Life Among the Immediate Loading Implant Overdentures Using the Single and the Double Implants: An Original Study.单颗与两颗种植体即刻负重覆盖义齿患者生活质量的比较:一项原创研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S161-S165. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_444_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
5
Unsplinted Attachments and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in 2-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review.两颗种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿中未使用夹板的附件与患者报告结局指标(PROMs):一项系统评价
Int J Dent. 2022 May 24;2022:5955847. doi: 10.1155/2022/5955847. eCollection 2022.
6
Oral health-related quality of life of patients using single or two-implant mandibular overdentures with immediate loading protocols: A randomized controlled trial.采用即刻加载方案的单种植体和双种植体下颌覆盖义齿患者的口腔健康相关生活质量:一项随机对照试验。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Oct-Dec;21(4):375-382. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_328_21.
7
Clinical and satisfaction outcomes of using one or two dental implants for mandibular overdentures: preliminary short-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.使用一颗或两颗牙种植体修复下颌覆盖义齿的临床和满意度结果:一项随机临床试验的初步短期随访。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Feb 11;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00286-8.
8
Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis.种植体支持式假牙与传统假牙相比的成本效益。
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Aug 19;53:S0034-89102019000100257. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001066.
9
Transcriptomic profiling of tantalum metal implant osseointegration in osteopenic patients.骨质疏松患者钽金属植入物骨整合的转录组分析
BDJ Open. 2018 Nov 23;4:17042. doi: 10.1038/s41405-018-0004-6. eCollection 2018.
10
Impact of a "TED-Style" presentation on potential patients' willingness to accept dental implant therapy: a one-group, pre-test post-test study.“TED 式”演讲对潜在患者接受种植牙治疗意愿的影响:一项单组前后测研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Dec;7(6):437-45. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.437. Epub 2015 Dec 30.