Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Champs Fleurs, Trinidad, West Indies.
BMC Emerg Med. 2012 Aug 2;12:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-12-9.
In paediatric emergency medicine, estimation of weight in ill children can be performed in a variety of ways. Calculation using the 'APLS' formula (weight = [age + 4] × 2) is one very common method. Studies on its validity in developed countries suggest that it tends to under-estimate the weight of children, potentially leading to errors in drug and fluid administration. The formula is not validated in Trinidad and Tobago, where it is routinely used to calculate weight in paediatric resuscitation.
Over a six-week period in January 2009, all children one to five years old presenting to the Emergency Department were weighed. Their measured weights were compared to their estimated weights as calculated using the APLS formula, the Luscombe and Owens formula and a "best fit" formula derived (then simplified) from linear regression analysis of the measured weights.
The APLS formula underestimated weight in all age groups with a mean difference of -1.4 kg (95% limits of agreement 5.0 to -7.8). The Luscombe and Owens formula was more accurate in predicting weight than the APLS formula, with a mean difference of -0.4 kg (95% limits of agreement 6.9 to -6.1%). Using linear regression analysis, and simplifying the derived equation, the best formula to describe weight and age was (weight = [2.5 x age] + 8). The percentage of children whose actual weight fell within 10% of the calculated weights using any of the three formulae was not significantly different.
The APLS formula slightly underestimates the weights of children in Trinidad, although this is less than in similar studies in developed countries. Both the Luscombe and Owens formula and the formula derived from the results of this study give a better estimate of the measured weight of children in Trinidad. However, the accuracy and precision of all three formulae were not significantly different from each other. It is recommended that the APLS formula should continue to be used to estimate the weight of children in resuscitation situations in Trinidad, as it is well known, easy to calculate and widely taught in this setting.
在儿科急救医学中,可以通过多种方式估算患病儿童的体重。使用“APLS”公式(体重= [年龄+4] × 2)进行计算是一种非常常见的方法。在发达国家进行的研究表明,该公式往往会低估儿童的体重,从而导致药物和液体给药错误。该公式在特立尼达和多巴哥未经验证,在那里它被常规用于计算儿科复苏中的体重。
在 2009 年 1 月的六周期间,对所有 1 至 5 岁就诊于急诊科的儿童进行称重。将他们的实测体重与使用 APLS 公式、Luscombe 和 Owens 公式以及从实测体重线性回归分析得出的“最佳拟合”公式(然后简化)计算得出的估计体重进行比较。
APLS 公式在所有年龄组中均低估了体重,平均差异为-1.4 公斤(95%置信区间为 5.0 至-7.8)。Luscombe 和 Owens 公式比 APLS 公式更准确地预测体重,平均差异为-0.4 公斤(95%置信区间为 6.9 至-6.1%)。使用线性回归分析并简化得出的方程,描述体重和年龄的最佳公式为(体重= [2.5 x 年龄] + 8)。使用这三个公式中的任何一个,实际体重落在计算体重的 10%范围内的儿童百分比没有显著差异。
APLS 公式略微低估了特立尼达的儿童体重,尽管这比发达国家的类似研究中要少。Luscombe 和 Owens 公式以及从本研究结果得出的公式都能更好地估计特立尼达儿童的实测体重。然而,这三个公式的准确性和精密度彼此之间没有显著差异。建议在特立尼达的复苏情况下继续使用 APLS 公式来估计儿童的体重,因为它是众所周知的,易于计算并且在这种情况下广泛教授。