Suppr超能文献

两种系统制作的陶瓷嵌体和高嵌体的临床评估:五年随访。

Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.

机构信息

The University of Western Ontario, Restorative Dentistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):3-11. doi: 10.2341/12-039-C. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

Abstract

This study evaluated the five-year clinical performance of ceramic inlays and onlays made with two systems: sintered Duceram (Dentsply-Degussa) and pressable IPS Empress (Ivoclar Vivadent). Eighty-six restorations were placed by a single operator in 35 patients with a median age of 33 years. The restorations were cemented with dual-cured resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent) and Syntac Classic adhesive under rubber dam. The evaluations were conducted by two independent investigators at baseline, and at one, two, three, and five years using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. At the five-year recall, 26 patients were evaluated (74.28%), totalling 62 (72.09%) restorations. Four IPS restorations were fractured, two restorations presented secondary caries (one from IPS and one from Duceram), and two restorations showed unacceptable defects at the restoration margin and needed replacement (one restoration from each ceramic system). A general success rate of 87% was recorded. The Fisher exact test revealed no significant difference between Duceram and IPS Empress ceramic systems for all aspects evaluated at different recall appointments (p>0.05). The McNemar chi-square test showed significant differences in relation to marginal discoloration, marginal integrity, and surface texture between the baseline and five-year recall for both systems (p<0.001), with an increased percentage of Bravo scores. However, few Charlie or Delta scores were attributed to these restorations. In conclusion, these two types of ceramic materials demonstrated acceptable clinical performance after five years.

摘要

本研究评估了两种系统制作的陶瓷嵌体和高嵌体的五年临床性能

烧结 Duceram(登士柏- Degussa)和可压型 IPS Empress(义获嘉伟瓦登特)。一位操作者在 35 名中位年龄为 33 岁的患者中放置了 86 个修复体。修复体用双固化树脂水门汀(Variolink II,义获嘉伟瓦登特)和 Syntac Classic 黏结剂在橡皮障下黏结。基线时和 1、2、3、5 年时由两名独立研究者使用改良的美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准进行评估。在五年随访时,对 26 名患者(74.28%)进行了评估,共评估了 62 个修复体(72.09%)。4 个 IPS 修复体发生了断裂,2 个修复体出现了继发龋(1 个来自 IPS,1 个来自 Duceram),2 个修复体的修复体边缘出现了不可接受的缺陷,需要更换(来自每个陶瓷系统各 1 个修复体)。记录的总体成功率为 87%。Fisher 确切检验显示,在不同随访时间点,Duceram 和 IPS Empress 陶瓷系统在所有评估方面均无显著差异(p>0.05)。McNemar 卡方检验显示,两种系统在基线和五年随访时的边缘变色、边缘完整性和表面质地方面均存在显著差异(p<0.001),Bravo 评分的百分比增加。然而,这些修复体的 Charlie 或 Delta 评分很少。结论:这两种类型的陶瓷材料在五年后表现出可接受的临床性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验