Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N
Policlinic for Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Glueckstrasse 11, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):459-65.
Ceramic inlays are an esthetic substitute for large amalgam and other metallic restorations. This controlled clinical study evaluated the performance of IPS Empress inlays and onlays with cuspal replacements and proximal margins below the cementoenamel junction over six years of clinical service. Six dentists placed 96 ceramic restorations in 34 patients. Luting was accomplished using the enamel-etch-technique, a dentin bonding system (Syntac Classic) and four different composite systems. The restorations were assessed by two calibrated investigators using modified USPHS criteria at baseline (96 restorations), one (96), two (95), four (89) and six years (67). Seven of the 96 restorations investigated had to be replaced (failure rate 7%; Kaplan-Meier): Five inlays suffered cohesive bulk fractures and two teeth required endodontic treatment. After six years of clinical service, significant deterioration (Friedman 2-way ANOVA; p < 0.05) was found for marginal adaptation of the remaining restorations. Ninety-four percent of the surviving restorations exhibited marginal deficiencies, independent of the luting composite. Neither the absence of enamel margins, nor cuspal replacement significantly affected the quality of the restorations.
陶瓷嵌体是大型汞合金及其他金属修复体的美学替代物。这项对照临床研究评估了IPS Empress嵌体和高嵌体在临床使用六年期间的性能,这些修复体带有牙尖替代物且近中边缘位于牙骨质釉质界下方。六位牙医为34名患者放置了96颗陶瓷修复体。使用釉质酸蚀技术、一种牙本质粘结系统(Syntac Classic)和四种不同的复合树脂系统进行粘结。由两名经过校准的研究人员在基线时(96颗修复体)、一年(96颗)、两年(95颗)、四年(89颗)和六年(67颗)时使用改良的美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准对修复体进行评估。在研究的96颗修复体中,有7颗需要更换(失败率7%;Kaplan-Meier法):5颗嵌体出现粘结性大块折断,2颗牙齿需要进行牙髓治疗。经过六年的临床使用,发现其余修复体的边缘适应性出现显著恶化(Friedman双向方差分析;p<0.05)。94%的留存修复体存在边缘缺陷,与粘结复合树脂无关。无论是没有釉质边缘,还是牙尖替代物,均未对修复体质量产生显著影响。