• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SMASH-U:一种针对脑出血病因分类的建议。

SMASH-U: a proposal for etiologic classification of intracerebral hemorrhage.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 340, FI-00029 HUS, Finland.

出版信息

Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2592-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661603. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661603
PMID:22858729
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to provide a simple and practical clinical classification for the etiology of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with ICH treated at the Helsinki University Central Hospital, January 2005 to March 2010 (n=1013). We classified ICH etiology by predefined criteria as structural vascular lesions (S), medication (M), amyloid angiopathy (A), systemic disease (S), hypertension (H), or undetermined (U). Clinical and radiological features and mortality by SMASH-U (Structural lesion, Medication, Amyloid angiopathy, Systemic/other disease, Hypertension, Undetermined) etiology were analyzed.

RESULTS

Structural lesions, namely cavernomas and arteriovenous malformations, caused 5% of the ICH, anticoagulation 14%, and systemic disease 5% (23 liver cirrhosis, 8 thrombocytopenia, and 17 various rare conditions). Amyloid angiopathy (20%) and hypertensive angiopathy (35%) were common, but etiology remained undetermined in 21%. Interrater agreement in classifying cases was high (κ, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96). Patients with structural lesions had the smallest hemorrhages (median volume, 2.8 mL) and best prognosis (3-month mortality 4%), whereas anticoagulation-related ICHs were largest (13.4 mL) and most often fatal (54%). Overall, median ICH survival was 5½ years, varying strongly by etiology (P<0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients with structural lesions had the lowest 3-month mortality rates (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.37) and those with anticoagulation (OR, 1.9; 1.0-3.6) or other systemic cause (OR, 4.0; 1.6-10.1) the highest.

CONCLUSIONS

In our patients, performing the SMASH-U classification was feasible and interrater agreement excellent. A plausible etiology was determined in most patients but remained elusive in one in 5. In this series, SMASH-U based etiology was strongly associated with survival.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在为颅内出血(ICH)的病因提供一种简单实用的临床分类方法。

方法

我们对 2005 年 1 月至 2010 年 3 月在赫尔辛基大学中心医院接受治疗的连续ICH 患者进行了回顾性图表审查(n=1013)。我们根据预先确定的标准将 ICH 病因分类为结构性血管病变(S)、药物(M)、淀粉样血管病(A)、系统性疾病(S)、高血压(H)或未确定(U)。通过 SMASH-U(结构性病变、药物、淀粉样血管病、系统性/其他疾病、高血压、未确定)病因分析了临床和影像学特征以及死亡率。

结果

结构性病变,即海绵状血管瘤和动静脉畸形,占 ICH 的 5%,抗凝治疗占 14%,系统性疾病占 5%(23 例肝硬化,8 例血小板减少症和 17 例各种罕见疾病)。淀粉样血管病(20%)和高血压性血管病(35%)很常见,但仍有 21%的病因未确定。分类病例的观察者间一致性很高(κ,0.89;95%CI,0.82-0.96)。结构性病变患者的出血灶最小(中位数体积为 2.8ml),预后最好(3 个月死亡率为 4%),而抗凝治疗相关的 ICH 最大(13.4ml),且最常致命(54%)。总体而言,ICH 的中位生存时间为 5 年半,病因差异很大(P<0.001)。在调整基线特征后,结构性病变患者的 3 个月死亡率最低(OR,0.06;95%CI,0.01-0.37),抗凝治疗(OR,1.9;1.0-3.6)或其他系统性病因(OR,4.0;1.6-10.1)患者死亡率最高。

结论

在我们的患者中,进行 SMASH-U 分类是可行的,观察者间一致性很好。大多数患者可以确定合理的病因,但仍有五分之一的患者病因难以确定。在本系列中,基于 SMASH-U 的病因与生存率密切相关。

相似文献

1
SMASH-U: a proposal for etiologic classification of intracerebral hemorrhage.SMASH-U:一种针对脑出血病因分类的建议。
Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2592-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661603. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
2
Pathogenetical subtypes of recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage: designations by SMASH-U classification system.复发性脑出血的致病亚型:采用SMASH-U分类系统命名
Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2636-42. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005598. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
3
The etiologic subtype of intracerebral hemorrhage may influence the risk of significant hematoma expansion.脑出血的病因亚型可能会影响显著血肿扩大的风险。
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Dec 15;359(1-2):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.11.024. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
4
Blood Pressure and Outcomes in Patients With Different Etiologies of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Cohort Study.不同病因脑出血患者的血压与结局:一项多中心队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e016766. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016766. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
5
SMASH-U versus H-ATOMIC: A Head-to-Head Comparison for the Etiologic Classification of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.SMASH-U与H-ATOMIC:脑出血病因分类的直接比较
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Sep;27(9):2375-2380. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Closer Look at Hypertension and Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.原发性脑出血:高血压与脑淀粉样血管病的深入探讨。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0514-z.
7
Simultaneous Multiple Intracerebral Hemorrhages (SMICH).同时性多发性脑内出血
Stroke. 2017 Mar;48(3):581-586. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015186.
8
Pathogenesis and Subtype of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) and ICH Score Determines Prognosis.脑出血(ICH)的发病机制、亚型及ICH评分决定预后。
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2016;13(3):244-8. doi: 10.2174/1567202613666160527141128.
9
SMASH-U aetiological classification: A predictor of long-term functional outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage.SMASH-U 病因分类:脑出血后长期功能结局的预测指标。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Jan;29(1):178-187. doi: 10.1111/ene.15111. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
10
Influence of antithrombotics on the etiology of intracerebral hemorrhage.抗血栓药物对脑出血病因的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Mar;24(3):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.11.009. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment and prognosis analysis of patients with moderate-volume hypertensive basal ganglia haemorrhage using DTI-guided stereotactic puncture-based surgery.基于DTI引导立体定向穿刺手术治疗中等量高血压基底节区脑出血患者的疗效及预后分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1619514. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1619514. eCollection 2025.
2
Wake-up intracerebral hemorrhage: hematoma expansion and outcomes.清醒期脑出血:血肿扩大与预后
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 25;16:1620170. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1620170. eCollection 2025.
3
Sex-specific hemoglobin thresholds and longitudinal trajectories in intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes: a multicenter cohort study.
脑出血结局中的性别特异性血红蛋白阈值及纵向轨迹:一项多中心队列研究
BMC Neurol. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04254-w.
4
Assessing etiological classification systems and their relationship with neurological deterioration in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.评估脑出血患者的病因分类系统及其与神经功能恶化的关系。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07506-4.
5
Risk Factors for Early Poor Outcomes in In-hospital Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study.住院颅内出血早期不良结局的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02306-0.
6
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and severity of intracerebral hemorrhage: Insights from the SIREN study.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与脑出血严重程度:来自SIREN研究的见解
J Neurol Sci. 2025 Jul 15;474:123555. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2025.123555. Epub 2025 May 25.
7
Principles of reversal of anticoagulation in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage related to oral anticoagulants.与口服抗凝药相关的脑出血患者抗凝逆转的原则
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Apr;10(1_suppl):4-13. doi: 10.1177/23969873231222393. Epub 2025 May 22.
8
Application of promoting blood circulation and resolving blood stasis in intracerebral hemorrhage: a traditional method gradually being reconsidered.活血化瘀法在脑出血中的应用:一种正逐渐被重新审视的传统方法。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2025 Apr;45(2):458-472. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2025.02.017.
9
The Neuroprotective Role of Melatonin in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Lessons from an Observational Study.褪黑素在脑出血中的神经保护作用:一项观察性研究的经验教训
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):1729. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051729.
10
Deep-learning tool for early identification of non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage etiology and application in clinical diagnostics based on computed tomography (CT) scans.基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的深度学习工具,用于早期识别非创伤性颅内出血病因并应用于临床诊断。
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 26;13:e18850. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18850. eCollection 2025.