Suppr超能文献

原发性脑出血:高血压与脑淀粉样血管病的深入探讨。

Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Closer Look at Hypertension and Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0514-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) studies often use hematoma location rather than ICH etiologies when assessing outcome. Characterizing ICH using hematoma location is effective/reproducible, but may miss heterogeneity among these ICH locations, particularly lobar ICH where competing primary ICH etiologies are possible. We subsequently investigated baseline characteristics/outcome differences of spontaneous, primary ICH by their etiologies: cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and hypertension.

METHODS

Primary ICH clinical/outcomes data were prospectively collected between 2009 and 2015. Modified Boston criteria were used to identify "probable/definite" and "possible" CAA-ICH, which were evaluated separately. SMASH-U criteria were used to identify hypertension ICH. Medication and systemic disease coagulopathy ICH were excluded. Baseline characteristics/outcomes among "probable/definite" CAA-ICH, "possible" CAA-ICH, and hypertension ICH were compared using logistic regression. Mortality models using ICH etiologies compared to hematoma location as predictor variables were assessed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and four hypertension ICHs, 55 "probable/definite" CAA-ICHs, and 46 "possible" CAA-ICHs were identified. Despite older age and larger ICH volumes, lower hospital mortality was seen in "probable/definite" CAA-ICH versus hypertension ICH (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.05-0.8; p = 0.02) after adjusting for female gender, components of ICH score, and EVD placement. There were no mortality differences between "possible" CAA-ICH and hypertension ICH. However, lower hospital mortality was seen in "probable/definite" versus "possible" CAA-ICH (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.04-0.7; p = 0.02). When using ICH etiology rather than hematoma location, hospital mortality models significantly improved (χ: [df = 2, N = 305] = 6.2; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation is required to confirm the mortality heterogeneity seen within our primary ICH cohort. Hematoma location may play a role for these findings, but the mortality differences seen among lobar ICH using CAA-ICH subtypes and a failure to identify mortality differences between "possible" CAA-ICH and hypertension ICH suggest the limitations of accounting for hematoma location alone.

摘要

背景/目的:原发性脑出血(ICH)研究在评估结果时,通常使用血肿部位而不是 ICH 病因。使用血肿部位来描述 ICH 是有效的/可重复的,但可能会忽略这些 ICH 部位之间的异质性,尤其是在可能存在竞争原发性 ICH 病因的脑叶 ICH 中。随后,我们根据病因对自发性、原发性 ICH 的基线特征/结局差异进行了研究:脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)和高血压。

方法

原发性 ICH 的临床/结局数据是在 2009 年至 2015 年期间前瞻性收集的。采用改良波士顿标准来识别“可能/确定”和“可能”的 CAA-ICH,并分别进行评估。SMASH-U 标准用于识别高血压性 ICH。排除了药物和系统性疾病凝血障碍性 ICH。使用逻辑回归比较“可能/确定”CAA-ICH、“可能”CAA-ICH 和高血压性 ICH 之间的基线特征/结局。评估了使用 ICH 病因与血肿部位作为预测变量的死亡率模型。

结果

确定了 204 例高血压性 ICH、55 例“可能/确定”CAA-ICH 和 46 例“可能”CAA-ICH。尽管年龄较大,血肿体积较大,但与高血压性 ICH 相比,“可能/确定”CAA-ICH 的住院死亡率较低(OR 0.2;95%CI 0.05-0.8;p=0.02),调整女性性别、ICH 评分组成部分和 EVD 放置后。“可能”CAA-ICH 和高血压性 ICH 之间的死亡率没有差异。然而,“可能/确定”CAA-ICH 的住院死亡率低于“可能”CAA-ICH(OR 0.2;95%CI 0.04-0.7;p=0.02)。当使用 ICH 病因而不是血肿部位时,住院死亡率模型显著改善(χ:[df=2,N=305]=6.2;p=0.01)。

结论

需要进一步调查以确认我们原发性 ICH 队列中观察到的死亡率异质性。血肿部位可能对这些发现起作用,但在使用 CAA-ICH 亚型的脑叶 ICH 中观察到的死亡率差异以及未能确定“可能”CAA-ICH 和高血压性 ICH 之间的死亡率差异表明,仅考虑血肿部位存在局限性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验