Suppr超能文献

脑出血的病因亚型可能会影响显著血肿扩大的风险。

The etiologic subtype of intracerebral hemorrhage may influence the risk of significant hematoma expansion.

作者信息

Cappellari Manuel, Zivelonghi Cecilia, Moretto Giuseppe, Micheletti Nicola, Carletti Monica, Tomelleri Giampaolo, Bovi Paolo

机构信息

Stroke Unit, Division of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Italy.

Stroke Unit, Division of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2015 Dec 15;359(1-2):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.11.024. Epub 2015 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) growth is an important independent predictor of clinical deterioration and outcome. Little is known about the association between etiology of ICH and occurrence of hematoma expansion (HE). The aim of the present study was to assess whether ICH etiologic subtype may influence the risk of significant HE.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis on retrospectively collected data of 424 consecutive patients with ICH, who were admitted to the Verona General Hospital, from March 2011 to December 2014. Using the SMASH-U (Structural vascular lesions, Medication, Amyloid angiopathy, Systemic disease, Hypertension, or Undetermined) classification, we identified the ICH etiologic subtypes. Outcome measure was significant HE (an absolute increase in ICH volume>12.5 mL or >50%) within 48 h.

RESULTS

Significant HE occurred in 11/57 (19.3%) Amyloid, 7/14 (50%) Structural, 31/57 (54.4%) Medication, 25/44 (56.8%) in Systemic, 62/139 (44.6%) Hypertensive, and 21/68 (30.9%) Undetermined ICH. Baseline ICH volume (OR 1.011 per mL, 95% CI 1.006-1.017, p<0.001) and onset-to-baseline CT time (OR 0.919 per hour, 95% CI 0.852-0.990, p=0.027) were predictors of significant HE. Compared with Amyloid ICH, ORs for significant HE were higher in patients with Structural ICH (OR 1.430, 95% CI 1.060-1.948, p=0.023), Medication ICH (OR 4.344, 95% CI 1.382-13.653, p=0.012), Systemic ICH (OR 1.796, 95% CI 1.070-3.015, p=0.027), and Hypertensive ICH (OR 3.081, 95% CI 1.426-6.655, p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that Structural, Medication, Systemic, and Hypertensive ICH were the etiologic subtypes associated with a higher risk of significant HE, compared with Amyloid ICH patients.

摘要

背景

脑出血(ICH)的血肿扩大是临床病情恶化和预后的重要独立预测因素。关于脑出血病因与血肿扩大(HE)发生之间的关联,目前所知甚少。本研究的目的是评估脑出血的病因亚型是否会影响显著血肿扩大的风险。

方法

我们对2011年3月至2014年12月期间连续收治入维罗纳综合医院的424例脑出血患者的回顾性收集数据进行了分析。使用SMASH-U(结构性血管病变、药物、淀粉样血管病、全身性疾病、高血压或病因不明)分类法,我们确定了脑出血的病因亚型。观察指标为48小时内显著血肿扩大(脑出血体积绝对增加>12.5 mL或>50%)。

结果

在淀粉样血管病性脑出血患者中,11/57例(19.3%)发生显著血肿扩大;结构性脑出血患者中,7/14例(50%)发生显著血肿扩大;药物性脑出血患者中,31/57例(54.4%)发生显著血肿扩大;全身性疾病相关性脑出血患者中,25/44例(56.8%)发生显著血肿扩大;高血压性脑出血患者中,62/139例(44.6%)发生显著血肿扩大;病因不明的脑出血患者中,21/68例(30.9%)发生显著血肿扩大。基线脑出血体积(每毫升OR 1.011,95%可信区间1.006 - 1.017,p<0.001)和发病至基线CT检查时间(每小时OR 0.919,95%可信区间0.852 - 0.990,p = 0.027)是显著血肿扩大的预测因素。与淀粉样血管病性脑出血相比,结构性脑出血患者显著血肿扩大的OR值更高(OR 1.430,95%可信区间1.060 - 1.948,p = 0.023),药物性脑出血患者(OR 4.344,95%可信区间1.382 - 13.653,p = 0.012),全身性疾病相关性脑出血患者(OR 1.796,95%可信区间1.070 - 3.015,p = 0.027),以及高血压性脑出血患者(OR 3.081,95%可信区间1.426 - 6.655,p = 0.004)。

结论

我们的研究表明,与淀粉样血管病性脑出血患者相比,结构性、药物性、全身性疾病相关性和高血压性脑出血是与显著血肿扩大风险较高相关的病因亚型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验