Suppr超能文献

一种新型苹果味口服补液盐在儿童急性肠胃炎中的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Efficacy and safety of a new apple-flavoured oral rehydration solution in children with acute gastroenteritis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Dzialdowska 1, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2012 Oct;101(10):e458-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02782.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of a new oral rehydration solution (ORS) with improved flavour in the management of children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE).

METHODS

Children 4 to 48 months of age with AGE (≥3 loose or watery stools per day for >1 but <5 days) with mild-to-moderate dehydration (3% to 9% loss of body weight) according to the World Health Organization criteria randomly received regular hypotonic ORS (Na 60 mmol/L, glucose 78 mmol/L) or the same hypotonic ORS with an apple taste.

RESULTS

Of the 147 children randomized, 130 (88.4%) were available for intention-to-treat analysis. The proportion of children with the resolution of signs of dehydration in the experimental group compared with the control group was similar at 24 h (49/63 vs. 57/67, respectively, p = 0.28). There were also no significant differences in adequate weight gain (p = 0.48) and urine production at 24 h (p = 0.95) between groups. There were no differences between groups in any of the secondary outcome measures, including ORS intake. No adverse events were observed in the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In an outpatient setting, there was no difference in efficacy between the study products. Both ORSs were equally effective and may be used interchangeably.

摘要

目的

评估一种新型口服补液盐(ORS)在治疗儿童急性肠胃炎(AGE)中的疗效和安全性,该新型 ORS 口感改善。

方法

根据世界卫生组织标准,选择年龄在 4 至 48 个月、患有 AGE(每天大便次数≥3 次且稀水样便,持续时间 1 至 5 天)且伴有轻至中度脱水(体重丢失 3%至 9%)的儿童,将其随机分为两组,分别接受常规低渗 ORS(Na 60mmol/L,葡萄糖 78mmol/L)或添加苹果口味的相同低渗 ORS。

结果

在随机分配的 147 名儿童中,有 130 名(88.4%)符合意向治疗分析。实验组和对照组在 24 小时时,脱水症状缓解的儿童比例相似(分别为 49/63 和 57/67,p=0.28)。两组在 24 小时时体重增加适当(p=0.48)和尿液生成(p=0.95)方面也无显著差异。两组在次要结局指标方面均无差异,包括 ORS 摄入量。两组均未观察到不良事件。

结论

在门诊环境中,两种研究产品在疗效上无差异。两种 ORS 同样有效,可以相互替代。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验