Ganekal S
Nayana Super Specialty Eye Hospital and Research Center, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul-Dec;4(2):236-41. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v4i2.6538.
To compare the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) with peripapillary retinal fiber layer (RNFL) thickness map in glaucoma suspects and patients.
Forty participants (20 glaucoma suspects and 20 glaucoma patients) were enrolled. Macular GCC and RNFL thickness maps were performed in both eyes of each participant in the same visit. The sensitivity and specificity of a color code less than 5% (red or yellow) for glaucoma diagnosis were calculated. Standard Automated Perimetry was performed with the Octopus 3.1.1 Dynamic 24-2 program.
The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 10.1 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, EUA). Results were expressed as mean +/- standard deviation and a p value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.
Provide absolute numbers of these findings with their units of measurement. There was a statistically significant difference in average RNFL thickness (p=0.004), superior RNFL thickness (p=0.006), inferior RNFL thickness (p=0.0005) and average GCC (p=0.03) between the suspects and glaucoma patients. There was no difference in optic disc area (p=0.35) and vertical cup/disc ratio (p=0.234) in both groups. While 38% eyes had an abnormal GCC and 13% had an abnormal RNFL thickness in the glaucoma suspect group, 98% had an abnormal GCC and 90% had an abnormal RNFL thickness in the glaucoma group.
The ability to diagnose glaucoma with macular GCC thickness is comparable to that with peripapillary RNFL thickness . Macular GCC thickness measurements may be a good alternative or a complementary measurement to RNFL thickness assessment in the clinical evaluation of glaucoma.
比较青光眼疑似患者和青光眼患者的黄斑神经节细胞复合体(GCC)与视乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度图。
招募了40名参与者(20名青光眼疑似患者和20名青光眼患者)。在同一次就诊时对每位参与者的双眼进行黄斑GCC和RNFL厚度图检查。计算青光眼诊断中颜色代码小于5%(红色或黄色)的敏感性和特异性。使用Octopus 3.1.1动态24-2程序进行标准自动视野检查。
使用SPSS 10.1(SPSS公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥,美国)进行统计分析。结果以平均值±标准差表示,p值小于或等于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
给出这些发现的绝对数值及其测量单位。疑似患者和青光眼患者之间的平均RNFL厚度(p = 0.004)、上方RNFL厚度(p = 0.006)、下方RNFL厚度(p = 0.0005)和平均GCC(p = 0.03)存在统计学显著差异。两组的视盘面积(p = 0.35)和垂直杯盘比(p = 0.234)无差异。在青光眼疑似患者组中,38%的眼睛GCC异常,13%的眼睛RNFL厚度异常;在青光眼组中,98%的眼睛GCC异常,90%的眼睛RNFL厚度异常。
用黄斑GCC厚度诊断青光眼的能力与用视乳头周围RNFL厚度诊断青光眼的能力相当。在青光眼的临床评估中,黄斑GCC厚度测量可能是RNFL厚度评估的良好替代方法或补充测量方法。