Department of Psychology-Cognitive Psychology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):380-411. doi: 10.1037/a0029588. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
The article tests the assumption that forgetting in working memory for verbal materials is caused by time-based decay, using the complex-span paradigm. Participants encoded 6 letters for serial recall; each letter was preceded and followed by a processing period comprising 4 trials of difficult visual search. Processing duration, during which memory could decay, was manipulated via search set size. This manipulation increased retention interval by up to 100% without having any effect on recall accuracy. This result held with and without articulatory suppression. Two experiments using a dual-task paradigm showed that the visual search process required central attention. Thus, even when memory maintenance by central attention and by articulatory rehearsal was prevented, a large delay had no effect on memory performance, contrary to the decay notion. Most previous experiments that manipulated the retention interval and the opportunity for maintenance processes in complex span have confounded these variables with time pressure during processing periods. Three further experiments identified time pressure as the variable that affected recall. We conclude that time-based decay does not contribute to the capacity limit of verbal working memory.
本文使用复杂跨度范式检验了工作记忆中言语材料遗忘是由基于时间的衰减引起的假设。参与者对 6 个字母进行序列回忆;每个字母前面和后面都有一个处理期,包含 4 次困难的视觉搜索试验。通过搜索集大小来操纵处理持续时间,从而增加了最长达 100%的保留间隔,而对回忆准确性没有任何影响。在没有和有发音抑制的情况下,这个结果都是成立的。两个使用双任务范式的实验表明,视觉搜索过程需要中央注意。因此,即使中央注意和发音复述的记忆维持被阻止,长延迟对记忆表现没有影响,这与衰减的概念相反。以前大多数操纵复杂跨度中的保留间隔和维持过程机会的实验将这些变量与处理期间的时间压力混淆在一起。另外三个实验确定了时间压力是影响回忆的变量。我们的结论是,基于时间的衰减不会导致言语工作记忆的容量限制。