Whitehead Peter S, Pfeuffer Christina U, Egner Tobias
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Department of Psychology, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany.
J Cogn. 2022 Apr 7;5(1):26. doi: 10.5334/joc.218. eCollection 2022.
It has been proposed that cognitive control processes may be implemented in a contextually appropriate manner through the encoding, and cued retrieval, of associations between stimuli and the control processes that were active during their encoding, forming "stimulus-control bindings" as part of episodic event files. Prior work has found strong evidence for such a mechanism by observing behavioral effects of stimulus-control bindings based on a single pairing (one-shot learning). Here, we addressed the important question of how durable these one-shot stimulus-control bindings are. Over three experiments, we investigated the durability of one-shot stimulus-control bindings in relation to both the passage of time and the number of intervening events between the encoding (prime) and retrieval (probe) of the stimulus-control bindings. We found that stimulus-control bindings are quite robust to temporal decay, lasting at least up to 5 minutes in the absence of similar intervening events. By contrast, binding effects were more short-lived in the face of interference from the encoding of similar events between the prime and probe, with a maximum duration of ~2 minutes. Together, these results shed new light on the characteristics of the binding mechanisms underlying the integration of internal control processes in episodic event files and highlight that interference, rather than temporal decay, may be the main limiting factor on long-term effects of item-specific one-shot control learning.
有人提出,认知控制过程可能通过对刺激与编码过程中活跃的控制过程之间的关联进行编码和线索检索,以一种上下文合适的方式来实现,从而形成“刺激-控制绑定”,作为情景事件文件的一部分。先前的研究通过观察基于单次配对(一次性学习)的刺激-控制绑定的行为效应,为这种机制找到了有力证据。在这里,我们探讨了这些一次性刺激-控制绑定的持久程度这一重要问题。在三个实验中,我们研究了一次性刺激-控制绑定的持久性,涉及时间的流逝以及刺激-控制绑定的编码(启动)和检索(探测)之间的中间事件数量。我们发现,刺激-控制绑定对时间衰减相当稳健,在没有类似中间事件的情况下至少持续5分钟。相比之下,面对启动和探测之间类似事件编码的干扰时,绑定效应持续时间更短,最长持续约2分钟。总之,这些结果为情景事件文件中内部控制过程整合背后的绑定机制的特征提供了新的见解,并突出表明干扰而非时间衰减可能是特定项目一次性控制学习长期效应的主要限制因素。