Department Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5ZZ, UK.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Aug 6;12:87. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-87.
Access to medical records on the Internet has been reported to be acceptable and popular with patients, although most published evaluations have been of primary care or office-based practice. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of making unscreened results and data from a complex chronic disease pathway (renal medicine) available to patients over the Internet in a project involving more than half of renal units in the UK.
Content and presentation of the Renal PatientView (RPV) system was developed with patient groups. It was designed to receive information from multiple local information systems and to require minimal extra work in units. After piloting in 4 centres in 2005 it was made available more widely. Opinions were sought from both patients who enrolled and from those who did not in a paper survey, and from staff in an electronic survey. Anonymous data on enrollment and usage were extracted from the webserver.
By mid 2011 over 17,000 patients from 47 of the 75 renal units in the UK had registered. Users had a wide age range (<10 to >90 yrs) but were younger and had more years of education than non-users. They were enthusiastic about the concept, found it easy to use, and 80% felt it gave them a better understanding of their disease. The most common reason for not enrolling was being unaware of the system. A minority of patients had security concerns, and these were reduced after enrolling. Staff responses were also strongly positive. They reported that it aided patient concordance and disease management, and increased the quality of consultations with a neutral effect on consultation length. Neither patient nor staff responses suggested that RPV led to an overall increase in patient anxiety or to an increased burden on renal units beyond the time required to enroll each patient.
Patient Internet access to secondary care records concerning a complex chronic disease is feasible and popular, providing an increased sense of empowerment and understanding, with no serious identified negative consequences. Security concerns were present but rarely prevented participation. These are powerful reasons to make this type of access more widely available.
互联网获取医疗记录已被报道为患者可接受且受欢迎的方式,尽管大多数已发表的评估都针对初级保健或基于诊所的实践。我们在一个涉及英国超过一半肾脏单位的项目中测试了向患者提供互联网上复杂慢性病途径(肾脏医学)未经筛选的结果和数据的可行性和可接受性。
与患者群体共同开发了肾脏患者视图(RPV)系统的内容和演示。它旨在接收来自多个本地信息系统的信息,并且在单位中需要最小的额外工作。在 2005 年 4 个中心进行试点后,它被更广泛地提供。通过纸质调查,向注册和未注册的患者以及电子调查中的工作人员征求意见。从网络服务器中提取关于注册和使用的匿名数据。
截至 2011 年年中,英国 75 个肾脏单位中的 47 个单位有超过 17000 名患者注册。用户的年龄范围很广(<10 至> 90 岁),但比未注册用户年轻,受教育程度更高。他们对这一概念很感兴趣,发现使用起来很容易,并且 80%的人认为这使他们更好地了解了自己的疾病。不注册的最常见原因是不知道该系统。少数患者对安全性存在担忧,注册后这些担忧有所减少。工作人员的反应也非常积极。他们报告说,这有助于患者的一致性和疾病管理,并提高了咨询质量,对咨询时间长度没有产生负面影响。患者和工作人员的反应都没有表明 RPV 会导致患者整体焦虑增加,也不会给肾脏单位带来超出每个患者注册所需的额外负担。
患者互联网访问二级保健记录有关复杂慢性病是可行的,也是受欢迎的,提供了一种增强的授权感和理解感,没有发现严重的负面后果。存在安全问题,但很少有问题阻止参与。这是使这种类型的访问更广泛可用的有力理由。