文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey.

作者信息

Zanaboni Paolo, Kummervold Per Egil, Sørensen Tove, Johansen Monika Alise

机构信息

Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 7;22(2):e16144. doi: 10.2196/16144.


DOI:10.2196/16144
PMID:32031538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7055829/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The electronic health record (EHR) has been fully established in all Norwegian hospitals. Patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) are available to citizens aged 16 years and older through the national health portal Helsenorge. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at understanding how patients use PAEHRs. Three research questions were addressed in order to explore (1) characteristics of users, (2) patients' use of the service, and (3) patient experience with the service. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of users who had accessed their EHR online at least once through the national health portal. Patients from two of the four health regions in Norway were invited to participate. Quantitative data were supplemented by qualitative information. RESULTS: A total of 1037 respondents participated in the survey, most of whom used the PAEHR regularly (305/1037, 29.4%) or when necessary (303/1037, 29.2%). Service utilization was associated with self-reported health, age, gender, education, and health care professional background. Patients found the service useful to look up health information (687/778, 88.3%), keep track of their treatment (684/778, 87.9%), prepare for a hospital appointment (498/778, 64.0%), and share documents with their general practitioner (292/778, 37.5%) or family (194/778, 24.9%). Most users found it easy to access their EHR online (965/1037, 93.1%) and did not encounter technical challenges. The vast majority of respondents (643/755, 85.2%) understood the content, despite over half of them acknowledging some difficulties with medical terms or phrases. The overall satisfaction with the service was very high (700/755, 92.7%). Clinical advantages to the patients included enhanced knowledge of their health condition (565/691, 81.8%), easier control over their health status (685/740, 92.6%), better self-care (571/653, 87.4%), greater empowerment (493/674, 73.1%), easier communication with health care providers (493/618, 79.8%), and increased security (655/730, 89.7%). Patients with complex, long-term or chronic conditions seemed to benefit the most. PAEHRs were described as useful, informative, effective, helpful, easy, practical, and safe. CONCLUSIONS: PAEHRs in Norway are becoming a mature service and are perceived as useful by patients. Future studies should include experimental designs focused on specific populations or chronic conditions that are more likely to achieve clinically meaningful benefits. Continuous evaluation programs should be conducted to assess implementation and changes of wide-scale routine services over time.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e22/7055829/7959c439ea36/jmir_v22i2e16144_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e22/7055829/a88d54eb77e1/jmir_v22i2e16144_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e22/7055829/7959c439ea36/jmir_v22i2e16144_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e22/7055829/a88d54eb77e1/jmir_v22i2e16144_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e22/7055829/7959c439ea36/jmir_v22i2e16144_fig2.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-2-7

[2]
Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-5-28

[3]
Experiences from patients in mental healthcare accessing their electronic health records: results from a cross-national survey in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.

BMC Psychiatry. 2024-7-2

[4]
Users' Experiences With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Mental and Somatic Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-12-25

[5]
The NORDeHEALTH 2022 Patient Survey: Cross-Sectional Study of National Patient Portal Users in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Estonia.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-11-13

[6]
Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden.

J Med Internet Res. 2018-11-1

[7]
Errors, Omissions, and Offenses in the Health Record of Mental Health Care Patients: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Sweden.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-11-3

[8]
"Nothing About Me Without Me": An Interpretative Review of Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records.

J Med Internet Res. 2015-6-29

[9]
Sociotechnical Cross-Country Analysis of Contextual Factors That Impact Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records in 4 European Countries: Framework Evaluation Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-8-26

[10]
Security and Privacy of Online Record Access: A Survey of Adolescents' Views and Experiences in Sweden.

J Adolesc Health. 2024-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Usability and Usefulness of Occupational Health Care Patient Portals: Patient-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2025-8-14

[2]
Prevalence and types of errors in the electronic health record: protocol for a mixed systematic review.

BMJ Open. 2025-6-9

[3]
Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Implementing Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.

JMIR Med Inform. 2025-6-6

[4]
Impact of Patient Online Record Access on Documentation: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-2-20

[5]
Affordance trajectories and the usefulness of online records access among older adults in Sweden.

Digit Health. 2024-10-21

[6]
Navigating the Complexities of Nursing Documentation When Patients Have Access to the Content: A Qualitative Study.

J Adv Nurs. 2025-5

[7]
Sociotechnical Cross-Country Analysis of Contextual Factors That Impact Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records in 4 European Countries: Framework Evaluation Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-8-26

[8]
Designing an interoperable patient portal to augment an Advanced Nurse Practitioner service for Children with hydrocephalus.

Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024-7-8

[9]
Exploring How Patients Are Supported to Use Online Services in Primary Care in England Through "Digital Facilitation": Survey Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-8-7

[10]
Mapping Digital Public Health Interventions Among Existing Digital Technologies and Internet-Based Interventions to Maintain and Improve Population Health in Practice: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-7-17

本文引用的文献

[1]
OpenNotes After 7 Years: Patient Experiences With Ongoing Access to Their Clinicians' Outpatient Visit Notes.

J Med Internet Res. 2019-5-6

[2]
Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden.

J Med Internet Res. 2018-11-1

[3]
Methods to Evaluate the Effects of Internet-Based Digital Health Interventions for Citizens: Systematic Review of Reviews.

J Med Internet Res. 2018-6-7

[4]
Timing It Right - Patients' Online Access to Their Record Notes in Sweden.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018

[5]
Patients' Online Access to Electronic Health Records: Current Status and Experiences from the Implementation in Sweden.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017

[6]
Patient Portal Use and Experience Among Older Adults: Systematic Review.

JMIR Med Inform. 2017-10-16

[7]
Access to Electronic Personal Health Records Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Secondary Data Analysis.

J Med Internet Res. 2017-6-2

[8]
Requirements and access needs of patients with chronic disease to their hospital electronic health record: results of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

BMJ Open. 2016-10-14

[9]
Developing and Implementing Patients' Full-Scale Electronic Access to Their Health Record.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016

[10]
Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: portals to nowhere?

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017-4-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索