Department of Anesthesiology, Avicenna Military Hospital, Cadi Ayyad University, Faculty of Medicine, 40000, Marrakech, Morocco.
J Anesth. 2013 Feb;27(1):66-71. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1463-x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
The ability of the parasacral sciatic nerve block (PSNB) to induce anesthesia of the obturator nerve remains controversial. Our objective was to evaluate the anesthesia of the obturator nerve after a PSNB.
Forty patients scheduled to undergo knee surgery (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction) were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients were randomized to receive PSNB alone (control group, n = 20) or PSNB in combination with an obturator nerve block (obturator group, n = 20). After evaluation for 30 min, the two groups received a femoral nerve block, and patients were taken to surgery. The obturator nerve blockade was assessed by measurement of adductor strength at baseline (T0) and every 10 min during the 30-min evaluation (T10, T20, and T30). Pain scores after tourniquet inflation and during surgery were compared between the two groups. The requirement for additional intravenous analgesia and/or sedation was also recorded.
The two groups had comparable demographic and surgical characteristics. Four patients were excluded from the study because of PSNB or femoral nerve block failure. The adductor strength values were similar between groups at T0 but were significantly lower in the obturator group at T10, T20, and T30 (p < 0.0001). Patients in the obturator group reported less pain than those in the control group (p < 0.05). They also required less additional intravenous sedation and/or analgesia (p < 0.05).
This clinical study demonstrated that the PSNB is an unreliable means of inducing anesthesia of the obturator nerve and emphasizes the need to block this nerve separately to induce adequate analgesia during knee surgery.
腘旁坐骨神经阻滞(PSNB)能否诱导闭孔神经麻醉仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估 PSNB 后闭孔神经的麻醉效果。
本前瞻性、随机、对照研究纳入了 40 例行膝关节手术(前交叉韧带重建)的患者。患者随机分为 PSNB 单独组(对照组,n = 20)或 PSNB 联合闭孔神经阻滞组(闭孔组,n = 20)。评估 30 分钟后,两组均接受股神经阻滞,然后送入手术室。在基线(T0)和 30 分钟评估期间的每 10 分钟(T10、T20 和 T30)测量内收肌力量来评估闭孔神经阻滞情况。比较两组患者在止血带充气和手术期间的疼痛评分。记录两组患者对额外静脉镇痛和/或镇静的需求。
两组患者的人口统计学和手术特征具有可比性。由于 PSNB 或股神经阻滞失败,有 4 例患者被排除在研究之外。T0 时两组内收肌力量值相似,但闭孔组在 T10、T20 和 T30 时明显较低(p < 0.0001)。闭孔组患者的疼痛评分低于对照组(p < 0.05)。他们也需要更少的额外静脉镇静和/或镇痛(p < 0.05)。
本临床研究表明,PSNB 是一种不可靠的诱导闭孔神经麻醉的方法,并强调需要单独阻滞该神经以在膝关节手术中诱导足够的镇痛。