Orthopaedic and Injury Biomechanics Laboratory, Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 1;37(23):E1422-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826ba7cd.
In vivo large animal (pig) model study of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressures after acute experimental spinal cord injury (SCI).
To determine how the CSF pressure (CSFP) and CSF pulse pressure amplitude (CSFPPA) cranial and caudal to the injury site change after an acute SCI with subsequent thecal occlusion and decompression.
Lowering intrathecal pressure via CSF drainage is currently instituted to prevent ischemia-induced SCI during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery and was recently investigated as a potential intervention for acute traumatic SCI. However, in SCI patients, persistent extradural compression commonly occludes the subarachnoid space. This may generate a CSFP differential across the injury site, which cannot be appreciated with lumbar catheter pressure measurements.
Anesthetized pigs were subjected to an acute contusive SCI at T11 and 8 hours of sustained compression (n = 12), or sham surgery (n = 2). CSFP was measured cranial and caudal to the injury site, using miniature pressure transducers, during compression and for 6 hours after decompression.
The cranial-caudal CSFP differential increased (mean, 0.39 mm Hg/h), predominantly due to increased cranial pressure. On decompression, cranial CSFP decreased (mean, -1.16 mm Hg) and caudal CSFP increased (mean, 0.65 mm Hg). The CSFP differential did not change significantly after decompression. Cranial CSFPPA was greater than caudal CSFPPA, but this differential did not change during compression. On decompression, the caudal CSFPPA increased in some but not all animals.
Although extradural compression exists at the site of injury, lumbar CSFP may not accurately indicate CSFP cranial to the injury. Decompression may provide immediate, though perhaps partial, resolution of the pressure differential. CSFPPA was not a consistent indicator of decompression in this animal model. These findings may have implications for the design of future clinical protocols in which CSFP is monitored after acute SCI.
急性实验性脊髓损伤(SCI)后脑脊液(CSF)压力的体内大动物(猪)模型研究。
确定急性 SCI 后,通过硬脊膜外腔闭塞和减压,损伤部位颅侧和尾侧的 CSF 压力(CSFP)和 CSF 脉搏压幅度(CSFPPA)如何变化。
通过 CSF 引流降低椎管内压目前被用于预防胸腹主动脉瘤手术期间缺血性 SCI,并最近被研究作为急性创伤性 SCI 的潜在干预措施。然而,在 SCI 患者中,持续的硬膜外压迫通常会闭塞蛛网膜下腔。这可能会在损伤部位产生 CSF 压力差,而通过腰椎导管压力测量无法察觉到这种压力差。
麻醉猪在 T11 处发生急性挫伤性 SCI,并持续受压 8 小时(n = 12)或假手术(n = 2)。在受压期间和减压后 6 小时,使用微型压力传感器测量损伤部位颅侧和尾侧的 CSF 压力。
颅尾 CSF 压力差增加(平均,0.39mmHg/h),主要是由于颅压升高。减压后,颅压降低(平均,-1.16mmHg),而尾压升高(平均,0.65mmHg)。减压后 CSF 压力差无明显变化。颅 CSFPPA 大于尾 CSFPPA,但在受压期间,这种差异没有变化。减压后,一些但不是所有动物的尾 CSFPPA 增加。
尽管在损伤部位存在硬膜外压迫,但腰椎 CSF 压力可能无法准确指示损伤部位颅侧的 CSF 压力。减压可能会立即但可能只是部分解决压力差。CSFPPA 不是本动物模型减压的一致指标。这些发现可能对未来监测急性 SCI 后 CSF 压力的临床方案设计具有重要意义。