Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Mar 26;76:e2740. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2740. eCollection 2021.
The intrathecal route has not yet been thoroughly standardized and evaluated in an experimental model of spinal cord injury (SCI) in Wistar rats. The objective of this study was to standardize and evaluate the effect of intradural injection in this animal model.
The animals were divided into 6 groups: 1) laminectomy and intradural catheter; 2) laminectomy, intradural catheter and infusion; 3) only SCI; 4) SCI and intradural catheter; 5) SCI, intradural catheter and infusion; and 6) control (laminectomy only). Motor evaluations were performed using the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) scale and the horizontal ladder test; motor evoked potentials were measured for functional evaluation, and histological evaluation was performed as well. All experimental data underwent statistical analysis.
Regarding motor evoked potentials, the groups with experimental SCI had worse results than those without, but neither dural puncture nor the injection of intrathecal solution aggravated the effects of isolated SCI. Regarding histology, adverse tissue effects were observed in animals with SCI. On average, the BBB scores had the same statistical behaviour as the horizontal ladder results, and at every evaluated timepoint, the groups without SCI presented scored significantly better than those with SCI (p<0.05). The difference in performance on motor tests between rats with and without experimental SCI persisted from the first to the last test.
The present work standardizes the model of intradural injection in experimental SCI in rats. Intrathecal puncture and injection did not independently cause significant functional or histological changes.
在 Wistar 大鼠脊髓损伤(SCI)的实验模型中,鞘内途径尚未得到彻底的标准化和评估。本研究的目的是标准化并评估该动物模型中鞘内注射的效果。
动物分为 6 组:1)椎板切除术和鞘内导管;2)椎板切除术、鞘内导管和输注;3)仅 SCI;4)SCI 和鞘内导管;5)SCI、鞘内导管和输注;6)对照组(仅椎板切除术)。使用 Basso、Beattie 和 Bresnahan(BBB)量表和水平梯测试进行运动评估;测量运动诱发电位进行功能评估,并进行组织学评估。所有实验数据均进行了统计分析。
关于运动诱发电位,实验组 SCI 动物的结果比无 SCI 动物差,但硬膜穿刺或鞘内溶液注射均未加重孤立 SCI 的影响。关于组织学,SCI 动物观察到不良的组织效应。平均而言,BBB 评分与水平梯结果具有相同的统计学行为,在每个评估时间点,无 SCI 的组的评分明显优于有 SCI 的组(p<0.05)。有和无实验性 SCI 的大鼠在运动测试中的表现差异从第一次测试持续到最后一次测试。
本工作标准化了大鼠实验性 SCI 中鞘内注射的模型。鞘内穿刺和注射本身不会引起明显的功能或组织学变化。