Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 1;37(23):E1450-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826c72b4.
A retrospective comparative study was performed in patients with 3-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
To compare the clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, and complication incidence of 3 reconstructive techniques after the anterior decompression of multilevel CSM.
There has been growing interest in combination of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for the treatment of multilevel CSM in recent years. However, the clinical efficacy and radiological outcomes of the hybrid decompression and fusion (HDF) have rarely been investigated.
A total of 180 consecutive patients with 3-level CSM undergoing the anterior decompression and fusion procedures from January 2003 to July 2010 were retrospectively investigated. According to various reconstructive techniques, the patients were divided into 3 groups: HDF, ACDF, and ACCF groups. The clinical effects and improvements of cervical and segmental lordosis in each group were assessed. In addition, the fusion rate, postoperative complications, and radiographical adjacent-level changes regarding each group were also evaluated.
No statistical differences in clinical effects, restoration of cervical lordosis, and incidences of postoperative complications were found between the HDF and ACDF groups (P > 0.05). The ACCF group has achieved clinical effects similar to the ACDF or HDF group (P > 0.05), but it had more bleeding, lower fusion rate, and higher incidences of postoperative complications compared with the ACDF or HDF group (P < 0.05). The improvements of the cervical and segmental lordosis in the ACCF group were significantly less than the ACDF or HDF group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in radiographical adjacent-level changes among the 3 groups (P > 0.05).
The HDF can be considered an effective and safe alternative procedure compared with ACDF in the treatment of the multilevel CSM, and ACCF should be the last option.
对 3 水平颈椎脊髓病(CSM)患者进行了回顾性对比研究。
比较 3 种重建技术在前路减压多节段 CSM 后临床效果、影像学参数和并发症发生率。
近年来,人们对前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)和前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)联合治疗多节段 CSM 的兴趣日益浓厚。然而,混合减压融合术(HDF)的临床疗效和影像学结果鲜有报道。
回顾性调查了 2003 年 1 月至 2010 年 7 月期间接受前路减压融合术的 180 例 3 水平 CSM 连续患者。根据不同的重建技术,将患者分为 3 组:HDF 组、ACDF 组和 ACCF 组。评估每组的临床疗效和颈椎及节段前凸角度的改善情况。此外,还评估了各组的融合率、术后并发症和影像学相邻节段变化。
HDF 组和 ACDF 组在临床疗效、颈椎前凸角度的恢复和术后并发症发生率方面无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。ACCF 组的临床疗效与 ACDF 组或 HDF 组相似(P > 0.05),但与 ACDF 组或 HDF 组相比,出血量更大、融合率更低、术后并发症发生率更高(P < 0.05)。ACCF 组颈椎和节段前凸角度的改善明显小于 ACDF 组或 HDF 组(P < 0.05)。3 组影像学相邻节段变化无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。
与 ACDF 相比,HDF 是治疗多节段 CSM 的一种有效、安全的替代方法,而 ACCF 应作为最后选择。