Suppr超能文献

多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术、椎板切除融合术和椎板成形术后颈椎矢状位序列的变化。

Cervical sagittal alignment changes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminectomy with fusion, and laminoplasty for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 11;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03640-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cervical sagittal alignment changes (CSACs) influence outcomes and health-related quality-of-life. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), laminectomy with fusion (LCF), and laminoplasty (LP) are common treatments for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy; however, these approaches need to be compared.

METHODS

Our study included 167 patients who underwent ACDF, LCF, or LP. Patients were divided into four groups according to C2-C7 Cobb angle (CL): kyphosis (CL < 0°), straight (0° ≤ CL < 10°), lordosis (10° ≤ CL < 20°), and extreme lordosis (20° ≤ CL) groups. CSACs consist of two parts. CSAC from the preoperative period to the postoperative period is surgical correction change (SCC). CSAC from the postoperative period to the final follow-up period is postoperative lordosis preserving (PLP). Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and the neck disability index.

RESULTS

ACDF, LCF, and LP had equivalent outcomes. ACDF had greater SCC than LCF and LP. During follow-up, lordosis decreased in the ACDF and LCF groups but increased in the LP group. For straight alignment, ACDF had greater CSAC and greater SCC than the LCF and LP groups but similar PLP. For lordosis alignment, ACDF and LP had positive PLP, and LCF had negative PLP. For extreme lordosis, ACDF, LP, and LCF had negative PLP; however, cervical lordosis in the LP group was relatively stable during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF, LCF, and LP have different CSAC, SCC, and PLP according to a four-type cervical sagittal alignment classification. Preoperative cervical alignment is an important consideration in deciding the type of surgical treatment in CSM.

摘要

目的

颈椎矢状位排列改变(CSAC)影响结果和健康相关生活质量。颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)、椎板切除术融合术(LCF)和椎板成形术(LP)是多节段颈椎病脊髓病的常见治疗方法;然而,需要对这些方法进行比较。

方法

本研究纳入了 167 例行 ACDF、LCF 或 LP 的患者。根据 C2-C7 Cobb 角(CL),患者分为 4 组:后凸(CL<0°)、直(0°≤CL<10°)、前凸(10°≤CL<20°)和极度前凸(20°≤CL)组。CSAC 由两部分组成。从术前到术后的 CSAC 为手术矫正变化(SCC)。从术后到最终随访期间的 CSAC 为术后保持前凸(PLP)。使用日本矫形协会评分和颈部残疾指数评估结果。

结果

ACDF、LCF 和 LP 的结果相当。ACDF 的 SCC 大于 LCF 和 LP。随访期间,ACDF 和 LCF 组的前凸减少,但 LP 组的前凸增加。对于直位,ACDF 的 CSAC 和 SCC 大于 LCF 和 LP 组,但 PLP 相似。对于前凸位,ACDF 和 LP 有正的 PLP,而 LCF 有负的 PLP。对于极度前凸,ACDF、LP 和 LCF 有负的 PLP;然而,LP 组的颈椎前凸在随访期间相对稳定。

结论

根据四种颈椎矢状位排列分类,ACDF、LCF 和 LP 具有不同的 CSAC、SCC 和 PLP。术前颈椎排列是决定 CSM 手术治疗类型的重要考虑因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a000/10007737/34c5b9d25970/13018_2023_3640_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验