Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 15;73(2):136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.036. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
Impaired response inhibition and poor impulse control are hallmarks of the manic phase of bipolar disorder but are also present during depressive and, to a lesser degree, euthymic periods. The neural mechanisms underlying these impairments are poorly understood, including how mechanisms are related to bipolar trait or state effects.
One-hundred four unmedicated participants with bipolar mania (BM) (n = 30), bipolar depression (BD) (n = 30), bipolar euthymia (BE) (n = 14), and healthy control subjects (n = 30) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during emotional and nonemotional go/no-go tasks. The go/no-go task requires participants to press a button for go stimuli, while inhibiting the response to no-go trials. In separate blocks, participants inhibited the response to happy faces, sad faces, or letters.
The BE group had higher insula activity during happy face inhibition and greater activity in left inferior frontal gyrus during sad face inhibition, demonstrating bipolar trait effects. Relative to the BE group, BD and BM groups demonstrated lower insula activity during inhibition of happy faces, though the depressed sample had lower activity than manic patients. The BD and BM groups had a greater response to inhibiting sad faces in emotion processing and regulation regions, including putamen, insula, and lateral prefrontal cortex. The manic group also had higher activity in insula and putamen during neutral letter inhibition.
These results suggest distinct trait- and state-related neural abnormalities during response inhibition in bipolar disorder, with implications for future research and treatment.
在双相情感障碍的躁狂期,存在着反应抑制受损和冲动控制差的现象,在抑郁期和轻躁狂期也存在这些现象。这些损伤的神经机制尚不清楚,包括这些机制与双相情感障碍的特质或状态效应有何关联。
104 名未接受药物治疗的双相躁狂症(BM)患者(n=30)、双相抑郁症(BD)患者(n=30)、双相轻躁狂症(BE)患者(n=14)和健康对照组(n=30)在进行情绪和非情绪 Go/No-go 任务时接受了功能磁共振成像。Go/No-go 任务要求参与者对 Go 刺激按下按钮,同时抑制对 No-go 试验的反应。在单独的脑区中,参与者抑制对高兴脸、悲伤脸或字母的反应。
BE 组在抑制高兴脸时岛叶活动较高,在抑制悲伤脸时左侧额下回活动较高,表现出双相情感障碍的特质效应。与 BE 组相比,BD 和 BM 组在抑制高兴脸时岛叶活动较低,尽管抑郁组的活动低于躁狂组。BD 和 BM 组在情绪处理和调节区域(包括壳核、岛叶和外侧前额叶皮层)对抑制悲伤脸的反应更大。躁狂组在抑制中性字母时岛叶和壳核的活动也更高。
这些结果表明,在双相情感障碍的反应抑制中存在着与特质和状态相关的神经异常,这对未来的研究和治疗有启示。