Horacek Jiri, Mikolas Pavol, Tintera Jaroslav, Novak Tomas, Palenicek Tomas, Brunovsky Martin, Höschl Cyril, Alda Martin
The Prague Psychiatric Centre, the Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic and the Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Prague Psychiatric Centre, Prague, Czech Republic.
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015 Mar;40(2):134-42. doi: 10.1503/jpn.140044.
Aberrant amygdala reactivity to affective stimuli represents a candidate factor predisposing patients with bipolar disorder (BD) to relapse, but it is unclear to what extent amygdala reactivity is state-dependent. We evaluated the modulatory influence of mood on amygdala reactivity and functional connectivity in patients with remitted BD and healthy controls.
Amygdala response to sad versus neutral faces was investigated using fMRI during periods of normal and sad mood induced by autobiographical scripts. We assessed the functional connectivity of the amygdala to characterize the influence of mood state on the network responsible for the amygdala response.
We included 20 patients with remitted BD and 20 controls in our study. The sad and normal mood exerted opposite effects on the amygdala response to emotional faces in patients compared with controls (F1,38 = 5.85, p = 0.020). Sad mood amplified the amygdala response to sad facial stimuli in controls but attenuated the amygdala response in patients. The groups differed in functional connectivity between the amygdala and the inferior prefrontal gyrus (p ≤ 0.05, family-wise error-corrected) of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) corresponding to Brodmann area 47. The sad mood challenge increased connectivity during the period of processing sad faces in patients but decreased connectivity in controls.
Limitations to our study included long-term medication use in the patient group and the fact that we mapped only depressive (not manic) reactivity.
Our results support the role of the amygdala-vlPFC as the system of dysfunctional contextual affective processing in patients with BD. Opposite amygdala reactivity unmasked by the mood challenge paradigm could represent a trait marker of altered mood regulation in patients with BD.
杏仁核对情感刺激的异常反应性是双相情感障碍(BD)患者复发的一个潜在因素,但尚不清楚杏仁核反应性在多大程度上依赖于状态。我们评估了情绪对缓解期BD患者和健康对照者杏仁核反应性及功能连接的调节影响。
在自传体脚本诱导的正常和悲伤情绪期间,使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究杏仁核对悲伤与中性面孔的反应。我们评估了杏仁核的功能连接,以表征情绪状态对负责杏仁核反应的网络的影响。
我们的研究纳入了20例缓解期BD患者和20名对照者。与对照者相比,悲伤和正常情绪对患者杏仁核对情绪面孔的反应产生了相反的影响(F1,38 = 5.85,p = 0.020)。悲伤情绪增强了对照者对悲伤面部刺激的杏仁核反应,但减弱了患者的杏仁核反应。两组在杏仁核与腹外侧前额叶皮层(vlPFC)对应于Brodmann区域47的额下回之间的功能连接存在差异(p≤0.05,家族性错误校正)。悲伤情绪挑战增加了患者在处理悲伤面孔期间的连接,但减少了对照者的连接。
我们研究的局限性包括患者组长期使用药物,以及我们仅绘制了抑郁(而非躁狂)反应性。
我们的结果支持杏仁核 - vlPFC作为BD患者功能失调的情境情感处理系统的作用。情绪挑战范式揭示的相反杏仁核反应性可能代表BD患者情绪调节改变的一个特质标记。