Suppr超能文献

两种类型的腹膜前网片在造口术中的比较:应用于动物模型。

A comparison of two types of preperitoneal mesh prostheses in stoma surgery: application to an animal model.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mancha-Centro General Hospital, Avenida de la Constitución 3, 13600, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain.

出版信息

Hernia. 2012 Dec;16(6):669-75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0966-6. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to compare the integration of two types of prostheses (high and low density, written as HD and LD, respectively) implanted around the stoma to reinforce the abdominal wall to prevent parastomal eventration. The surgical technique used for preperitoneal placement of the prostheses is also described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed terminal sigmoid colostomies on 16 porcine animals. In 8 of the animals, HD prostheses were placed around the stoma in preperitoneal position, while in the other 8, we implanted wide-pore LD prostheses using the same surgical technique. The following macroscopic variables were then measured: adhesion, extrusion, stenosis, and retraction. A morphological study was also carried out to evaluate the foreign body reaction and the formation of neovascularization and collagen. All animals were killed 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Differences were observed with regard to retraction (47 ± 17.8 % for HD vs. 55 ± 19.4 % for LD) and extrusion (50 % for HD vs. 0 % for LD). These differences did not reach statistical significance. There was a great amount of scarring for both types of prostheses, with stomal stenosis being observed in all cases. The number and consistency of intra-abdominal adhesions was low and similar for both types of prostheses. Neither eventration nor necrosis was observed for either type. With regard to the tissue response, we observed both fibrosis and calcification phenomena in the peristomal areas of the LD prostheses. In the HD group, there was both a lower scarring response and a higher foreign body response, with the areas of the prostheses remaining intact.

CONCLUSIONS

Both types of prostheses are appropriate for preperitoneal placement in the experimental model used, leading to few intra-abdominal adhesions. Still, due to their integration characteristics, LD prostheses are more appropriate for implanting around the colon since they do not seem to lead to extrusions. When using prostheses, however, it is also essential to consider the important phenomenon of retraction, which is more common with LD mesh.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在比较两种类型的假体(高密度和低密度,分别记为 HD 和 LD)在造口周围整合以增强腹壁,预防造口旁疝。还描述了用于假体腹膜前置入的手术技术。

材料与方法

我们对 16 头猪进行了末端乙状结肠造口术。在其中 8 头猪中,将 HD 假体放置在造口周围的腹膜前位置,而在另外 8 头猪中,我们使用相同的手术技术植入了宽孔 LD 假体。然后测量了以下宏观变量:粘连、脱出、狭窄和回缩。还进行了形态学研究以评估异物反应以及新生血管形成和胶原形成。所有动物均在手术后 3 个月处死。

结果

在回缩方面观察到差异(HD 为 47±17.8%,LD 为 55±19.4%)和脱出(HD 为 50%,LD 为 0%)。这些差异没有达到统计学意义。两种类型的假体都有大量的疤痕形成,所有情况下都观察到造口狭窄。两种类型的假体都有大量的腹腔内粘连,且数量和一致性相似。两种类型的假体均未观察到疝和坏死。就组织反应而言,我们在 LD 假体的造口周围区域观察到纤维化和钙化现象。在 HD 组中,疤痕反应较低,异物反应较高,假体区域保持完整。

结论

两种类型的假体在使用的实验模型中均适合腹膜前置入,导致的腹腔内粘连较少。尽管如此,由于其整合特性,LD 假体更适合植入结肠周围,因为它们似乎不会导致脱出。然而,在使用假体时,还必须考虑回缩的重要现象,这在 LD 网片中更为常见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验