Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 8;12:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-120.
Unanticipated control group improvements have been observed in intervention trials targeting various health behaviours. This phenomenon has not been studied in the context of behavioural weight loss intervention trials. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-regression of behavioural weight loss interventions to quantify control group weight change, and relate the size of this effect to specific trial and sample characteristics.
Database searches identified reports of intervention trials meeting the inclusion criteria. Data on control group weight change and possible explanatory factors were abstracted and analysed descriptively and quantitatively.
85 trials were reviewed and 72 were included in the meta-regression. While there was no change in control group weight, control groups receiving usual care lost 1 kg more than control groups that received no intervention, beyond measurement.
There are several possible explanations why control group changes occur in intervention trials targeting other behaviours, but not for weight loss. Control group participation may prevent weight gain, although more research is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
在针对各种健康行为的干预试验中,观察到了意想不到的对照组改善。在行为减肥干预试验的背景下,尚未对此现象进行研究。本研究的目的是对行为减肥干预试验进行系统回顾和荟萃回归分析,以量化对照组体重变化,并将该效应的大小与特定试验和样本特征联系起来。
数据库搜索确定了符合纳入标准的干预试验报告。摘录并分析了对照组体重变化和可能的解释因素的数据,进行了描述性和定量分析。
共审查了 85 项试验,其中 72 项纳入荟萃回归分析。尽管对照组体重没有变化,但与未接受任何干预的对照组相比,接受常规护理的对照组体重减轻了 1 公斤。
针对其他行为的干预试验中对照组发生变化的原因有几种可能的解释,但对于减肥则不然。对照组的参与可能会阻止体重增加,尽管需要更多的研究来证实这一假设。