Alam Mahbub-Ul, Winch Peter J, Saxton Ronald E, Nizame Fosiul A, Yeasmin Farzana, Norman Guy, Masud Abdullah-Al, Begum Farzana, Rahman Mahbubur, Hossain Kamal, Layden Anita, Unicomb Leanne, Luby Stephen P
Environmental Interventions Unit, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Aug;22(8):1000-1011. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12902. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
Shared toilets in urban slums are often unclean and poorly maintained, discouraging consistent use and thereby limiting impacts on health and quality of life. We developed behaviour change interventions to support shared toilet maintenance and improve user satisfaction. We report the intervention effectiveness on improving shared toilet cleanliness.
We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial among users of 1226 shared toilets in 23 Dhaka slums. We assessed baseline toilet cleanliness in January 2015. The six-month intervention included provision of hardware (bin for solid waste, 4 l flushing bucket, 70 l water reservoir), and behaviour change communication (compound meetings, interpersonal household sessions, signs depicting rules for toilet use). We estimated the adjusted difference in difference (DID) to assess outcomes and accounted for clustering effects using generalised estimating equations.
Compared to controls, intervention toilets were more likely to have water available inside toilet cubicles (DID: +4.7%, 95% CI: 0.2, 9.2), access to brush/broom for cleaning (DID: +8.4%, 95% CI: 2, 15) and waste bins (DID: +63%, 95% CI: 59, 66), while less likely to have visible faeces inside the pan (DID: -13%, 95% CI: -19, -5), the smell of faeces (DID: -7.6%, 95% CI: -14, -1.3) and household waste inside the cubicle (DID: -4%, 95% CI: -7, -1).
In one of few efforts to promote shared toilet cleanliness, intervention compounds were significantly more likely to have cleaner toilets after six months. Future research might explore how residents can self-finance toilet maintenance, or employ mass media to reduce per-capita costs of behaviour change.
城市贫民窟的公共厕所通常不卫生且维护不善,这使得人们不愿持续使用,从而限制了其对健康和生活质量的影响。我们制定了行为改变干预措施,以支持公共厕所的维护并提高用户满意度。我们报告了干预措施在改善公共厕所清洁度方面的效果。
我们在达卡23个贫民窟的1226个公共厕所用户中进行了一项整群随机对照试验。我们在2015年1月评估了厕所清洁度基线。为期六个月的干预措施包括提供硬件设施(固体废物箱、4升冲洗桶、70升水箱)以及行为改变宣传(大院会议、家庭人际会议、展示厕所使用规则的标识)。我们估计了调整后的差异中的差异(DID)以评估结果,并使用广义估计方程考虑聚类效应。
与对照组相比,干预组的厕所更有可能在小隔间内有可用的水(DID:+4.7%,95%置信区间:0.2,9.2)、有清洁用的刷子/扫帚(DID:+8.4%,95%置信区间:2,15)和垃圾桶(DID:+63%,95%置信区间:59,66),而便池内有可见粪便的可能性较小(DID:-13%,95%置信区间:-19,-5)、有粪便气味的可能性较小(DID:-7.6%,95%置信区间:-14,-1.3)以及小隔间内有生活垃圾的可能性较小(DID:-4%,95%置信区间:-7,-1)。
在为数不多的促进公共厕所清洁度的努力中,经过六个月后,干预大院的厕所明显更有可能更清洁。未来的研究可以探索居民如何自筹资金进行厕所维护,或者利用大众媒体降低行为改变的人均成本。