• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改变行为干预措施以改善达卡城市贫民窟公共厕所的维护与清洁状况:一项整群随机对照试验

Behaviour change intervention to improve shared toilet maintenance and cleanliness in urban slums of Dhaka: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Alam Mahbub-Ul, Winch Peter J, Saxton Ronald E, Nizame Fosiul A, Yeasmin Farzana, Norman Guy, Masud Abdullah-Al, Begum Farzana, Rahman Mahbubur, Hossain Kamal, Layden Anita, Unicomb Leanne, Luby Stephen P

机构信息

Environmental Interventions Unit, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Aug;22(8):1000-1011. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12902. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1111/tmi.12902
PMID:28556458
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Shared toilets in urban slums are often unclean and poorly maintained, discouraging consistent use and thereby limiting impacts on health and quality of life. We developed behaviour change interventions to support shared toilet maintenance and improve user satisfaction. We report the intervention effectiveness on improving shared toilet cleanliness.

METHODS

We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial among users of 1226 shared toilets in 23 Dhaka slums. We assessed baseline toilet cleanliness in January 2015. The six-month intervention included provision of hardware (bin for solid waste, 4 l flushing bucket, 70 l water reservoir), and behaviour change communication (compound meetings, interpersonal household sessions, signs depicting rules for toilet use). We estimated the adjusted difference in difference (DID) to assess outcomes and accounted for clustering effects using generalised estimating equations.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, intervention toilets were more likely to have water available inside toilet cubicles (DID: +4.7%, 95% CI: 0.2, 9.2), access to brush/broom for cleaning (DID: +8.4%, 95% CI: 2, 15) and waste bins (DID: +63%, 95% CI: 59, 66), while less likely to have visible faeces inside the pan (DID: -13%, 95% CI: -19, -5), the smell of faeces (DID: -7.6%, 95% CI: -14, -1.3) and household waste inside the cubicle (DID: -4%, 95% CI: -7, -1).

CONCLUSIONS

In one of few efforts to promote shared toilet cleanliness, intervention compounds were significantly more likely to have cleaner toilets after six months. Future research might explore how residents can self-finance toilet maintenance, or employ mass media to reduce per-capita costs of behaviour change.

摘要

目标

城市贫民窟的公共厕所通常不卫生且维护不善,这使得人们不愿持续使用,从而限制了其对健康和生活质量的影响。我们制定了行为改变干预措施,以支持公共厕所的维护并提高用户满意度。我们报告了干预措施在改善公共厕所清洁度方面的效果。

方法

我们在达卡23个贫民窟的1226个公共厕所用户中进行了一项整群随机对照试验。我们在2015年1月评估了厕所清洁度基线。为期六个月的干预措施包括提供硬件设施(固体废物箱、4升冲洗桶、70升水箱)以及行为改变宣传(大院会议、家庭人际会议、展示厕所使用规则的标识)。我们估计了调整后的差异中的差异(DID)以评估结果,并使用广义估计方程考虑聚类效应。

结果

与对照组相比,干预组的厕所更有可能在小隔间内有可用的水(DID:+4.7%,95%置信区间:0.2,9.2)、有清洁用的刷子/扫帚(DID:+8.4%,95%置信区间:2,15)和垃圾桶(DID:+63%,95%置信区间:59,66),而便池内有可见粪便的可能性较小(DID:-13%,95%置信区间:-19,-5)、有粪便气味的可能性较小(DID:-7.6%,95%置信区间:-14,-1.3)以及小隔间内有生活垃圾的可能性较小(DID:-4%,95%置信区间:-7,-1)。

结论

在为数不多的促进公共厕所清洁度的努力中,经过六个月后,干预大院的厕所明显更有可能更清洁。未来的研究可以探索居民如何自筹资金进行厕所维护,或者利用大众媒体降低行为改变的人均成本。

相似文献

1
Behaviour change intervention to improve shared toilet maintenance and cleanliness in urban slums of Dhaka: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.改变行为干预措施以改善达卡城市贫民窟公共厕所的维护与清洁状况:一项整群随机对照试验
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Aug;22(8):1000-1011. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12902. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
2
If I do not have enough water, then how could I bring additional water for toilet cleaning?! Addressing water scarcity to promote hygienic use of shared toilets in Dhaka, Bangladesh.如果我没有足够的水,那我怎么能弄到额外的水来清洁厕所呢?解决水资源短缺问题以促进孟加拉国达卡共享厕所的卫生使用。
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Sep;22(9):1099-1111. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12914. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
3
Piloting a low-cost hardware intervention to reduce improper disposal of solid waste in communal toilets in low-income settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh.在孟加拉国达卡的低收入住区试点一项低成本硬件干预措施,以减少公共厕所中固体废物的不当处置。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4693-x.
4
Shared toilet users' collective cleaning and determinant factors in Kampala slums, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟共用厕所使用者的集体清洁情况及决定因素
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 12;14:1260. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1260.
5
Inadequate sanitation in healthcare facilities: A comprehensive evaluation of toilets in major hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh.医疗设施卫生条件不足:对孟加拉国达卡主要医院厕所的综合评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0295879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295879. eCollection 2024.
6
Seasonal variations and shared latrine cleaning practices in the slums of Kampala city, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉市贫民窟的季节变化与共用厕所清洁做法
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3036-7.
7
Effectiveness of group discussions and commitment in improving cleaning behaviour of shared sanitation users in Kampala, Uganda slums.小组讨论和承诺对改善乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟共享卫生设施使用者清洁行为的有效性。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.059. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
Effect of a behaviour change intervention on the quality of peri-urban sanitation in Lusaka, Zambia: a randomised controlled trial.行为改变干预对赞比亚卢萨卡城市周边地区卫生质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Apr;3(4):e187-e196. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30036-1.
9
Neighbour-shared versus communal latrines in urban slums: a cross-sectional study in Orissa, India exploring household demographics, accessibility, privacy, use and cleanliness.印度奥里萨邦城市贫民窟邻里共用厕所与公共厕所对比:一项探索家庭人口统计学、可达性、隐私、使用情况和清洁程度的横断面研究
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Nov;109(11):690-9. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trv082.
10
Sanitation facilities in Kampala slums, Uganda: users' satisfaction and determinant factors.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟的卫生设施:使用者满意度及其决定因素。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2013;23(3):191-204. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2012.713095. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of skill-based health education-A randomised-controlled intervention in primary schools in rural Bangladesh.基于技能的健康教育的效果——孟加拉国农村小学的一项随机对照干预措施
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0327325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327325. eCollection 2025.
2
Promoting healthy practices among schools and children in rural bangladesh: a randomised controlled trial of skill-based health education.在孟加拉国农村推广学校和儿童的健康实践:基于技能的健康教育的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):3300. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20787-0.
3
ATP-based assessments of recent cleaning and disinfection for high-touch surfaces in low-resource shared toilets.
基于三磷酸腺苷(ATP)的低资源共享厕所中高接触表面近期清洁和消毒评估。
NPJ Clean Water. 2024;7(1). doi: 10.1038/s41545-024-00380-z.
4
Evaluation of SaTo pans as a new latrine technology in Kisumu County healthcare facilities, Kenya.评估 SaTo 便盆作为肯尼亚基苏木县医疗机构中的一种新型厕所技术。
Trop Med Int Health. 2023 Dec;28(12):881-889. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13939. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
5
Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies.促进低收入和中等收入国家采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)技术的干预措施:有效性研究的证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;17(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1194. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Evaluation of a menstrual hygiene intervention in urban and rural schools in Bangladesh: a pilot study.孟加拉国城乡学校经期卫生干预措施评估:一项试点研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):1100. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13478-1.
7
Shared but Clean Household Toilets: What Makes This Possible? Evidence from Ghana and Kenya.共用但清洁的家庭厕所:是什么让这成为可能?来自加纳和肯尼亚的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074271.
8
Relationships Among Toilet Sharing, Water Source Locations, and Handwashing Places Without Observed Soap: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Richest Households in Bangladesh.共用厕所、水源位置与未观察到肥皂的洗手场所之间的关系:孟加拉国最富裕家庭的横断面研究
Environ Health Insights. 2021 Nov 23;15:11786302211060163. doi: 10.1177/11786302211060163. eCollection 2021.
9
Using path analysis to test theory of change: a quantitative process evaluation of the MapSan trial.使用路径分析检验变革理论:MapSan 试验的定量过程评价。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):1411. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11364-w.
10
Where Shared Sanitation is the Only Immediate Option: A Research Agenda for Shared Sanitation in Densely Populated Low-Income Urban Settings.在共享卫生设施是唯一即时选择的情况下:人口稠密的低收入城市环境中共享卫生设施的研究议程。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Nov 16;104(2):429-432. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0985.