• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An in vitro comparison of penetration depth of two root canal sealers: An SEM study.两种根管封闭剂渗透深度的体外比较:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jul;15(3):261-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.97954.
2
A Confocal Microscopic Study on Percentage Penetration of Different Sealers into Dentin.不同封闭剂渗入牙本质百分比的共聚焦显微镜研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S725-S730. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_646_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
3
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.不同最终冲洗程序后AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA fillapex和guttaflow生物封闭根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)-Based, Resin-Based, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study.基于三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)、树脂和氧化锌丁香酚根管封闭剂封闭能力的比较评价:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 13;16(1):e52201. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52201. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Assessment of different irrigation techniques on the penetration depth of different sealers into dentinal tubules by confocal laser scanning microscope: An comparative study.通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜评估不同冲洗技术对不同封闭剂渗入牙本质小管深度的影响:一项比较研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):388-392. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_335_23. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
Minimal Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Endodontic Sealers in Warm Vertical Compaction by Direct Detection via SEM Analysis.通过扫描电子显微镜分析直接检测热垂直加压时根管封闭剂的最小牙本质小管渗透情况
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 27;10(19):4440. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194440.
7
Comparison of the penetration depth of five root canal sealers: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study.五种根管封闭剂渗透深度的比较:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;24(2):199-203. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_364_19. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
8
The Effect of Primary Root Canal Treatment on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers during Endodontic Retreatment.根管再治疗期间一次根管治疗对硅酸钙类封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响
J Endod. 2022 Sep;48(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.AH Plus、BC 根管封闭剂和新型硅酸三钙根管封闭剂对牙本质小管渗透的比较:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1871-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
Influence of smear layer on depth of penetration of three endodontic sealers: an SEM study.
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1998 Aug;14(4):191-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00836.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Cold Plasma on the Penetration Depth of AH26 and Beta Resin Sealers in Dentinal Tubules.冷等离子体对AH26和Beta树脂封闭剂在牙本质小管中渗透深度的影响。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Dec 1;25(4):309-315. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.98146.2059. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Effect of laser-activated irrigation on smear layer removal and sealer penetration: An study.激光活化冲洗对玷污层去除及封闭剂渗透的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;23(5):451-456. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_466_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration.硅酸钙基封闭剂的呈现形式会影响牙本质封闭吗?一项关于小管渗透的体外共聚焦激光研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 31;14(3):659. doi: 10.3390/ma14030659.
4
Effect of final irrigating solution on smear layer removal and penetrability of the root canal sealer.最终冲洗液对玷污层去除及根管封闭剂渗透性的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jan;17(1):40-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.124132.
5
Evaluation of the apical sealing ability and adaptation to the dentin of two resin-based Sealers: An in vitro study.两种树脂类封闭剂根尖封闭能力及与牙本质适应性的评估:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Sep;16(5):449-53. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.117518.

本文引用的文献

1
An in vitro comparative evaluation of depth of tubular penetration of three resin-based root canal sealers.三种树脂类根管封闭剂根管渗透深度的体外比较评估
J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jan;15(1):18-21. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.92600.
2
An in vitro study to determine the sealing ability of sealers with and without smear layer removal.一项关于确定去除和未去除玷污层的封闭剂封闭能力的体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2009 Oct;12(4):150-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.58335.
3
Endodontic sealers: Intratubular penetration and permeability to Enterococcus faecalis.
Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):40-3. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.62809.
4
The effect of resin-based sealers on fracture properties of dentine.树脂类封闭剂对牙本质断裂性能的影响。
Int Endod J. 2009 Feb;42(2):136-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01496.x.
5
The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.超声冲洗对使用不同锥度器械预备的人根管中人工放置的牙本质碎屑的清除效果。
Int Endod J. 2005 Oct;38(10):764-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01018.x.
6
The influence of the smear layer on dentinal tubule penetration depth by three different root canal sealers: an in vitro study.三种不同根管封闭剂对玷污层影响牙本质小管渗透深度的体外研究
J Endod. 2004 Feb;30(2):100-2. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200402000-00009.
7
Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals.磨牙根管手用器械预备后被动声波激活与被动超声激活的清洁效果比较
J Endod. 1999 Nov;25(11):735-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80120-4.
8
The effect of tubular penetration of root canal sealers on dye microleakage.
Int Endod J. 1996 Jan;29(1):23-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01355.x.
9
The antimicrobial effect within dentinal tubules of four root canal sealers.四种根管封闭剂在牙本质小管内的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 1996 May;22(5):257-9. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80144-5.
10
The vibratory pattern of ultrasonic files driven piezoelectrically.压电驱动超声锉的振动模式。
Int Endod J. 1993 Mar;26(2):120-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00553.x.

两种根管封闭剂渗透深度的体外比较:一项扫描电子显微镜研究

An in vitro comparison of penetration depth of two root canal sealers: An SEM study.

作者信息

Singh Chandra Vijay, Rao S Anitha, Chandrashekar V

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jul;15(3):261-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.97954.

DOI:10.4103/0972-0707.97954
PMID:22876015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3410338/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine in vitro penetration depth of two resin-based sealers (AH plus and Resino Seal) and Zinc Oxide Eugenol sealer into the dentinal tubules after removing smear layer by passive ultrasonic irrigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were used. The teeth were decoronated, working length established and prepared upto size 40 file. Each root was subjected to passive ultrasonic irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Three different sealers and gutta-percha were used for obturation. Roots were sectioned using hard tissue microtome. These sections were gold sputtered and examined under scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

Statistical analyses of the data were performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Statistically significant difference was found between AH Plus sealer and Resino Seal sealer and Zinc Oxide Eugenol sealer.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that AH Plus had maximum penetration depth into dentinal tubules.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是检测在通过被动超声冲洗去除玷污层后,两种树脂类封闭剂(AH plus和Resino Seal)以及氧化锌丁香酚封闭剂在牙本质小管中的体外渗透深度。

材料与方法

使用30颗新鲜拔除的上颌中切牙。对牙齿进行去冠处理,确定工作长度并预备至40号锉。每根牙根用2.5%次氯酸钠进行被动超声冲洗。使用三种不同的封闭剂和牙胶进行根管充填。使用硬组织切片机对牙根进行切片。这些切片进行喷金处理并在扫描电子显微镜下观察。

结果

使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney检验对数据进行统计学分析。发现AH Plus封闭剂与Resino Seal封闭剂和氧化锌丁香酚封闭剂之间存在统计学显著差异。

结论

结果表明,AH Plus在牙本质小管中的渗透深度最大。