Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Laboratoire OPTIMAG, University of Bretagne Occidentale, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, C.S. 93837, 29238, Brest Cedex 3, France.
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1871-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the dentinal tubule penetration of three different sealers, AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer (NTS).
Ninety-six human maxillary central incisors were divided into three experimental groups (n = 32) and were filled with gutta-percha using a single-cone technique in conjunction with one of the three sealers: AH Plus, BC Sealer or NTS. The roots in each group were cross-sectioned at 1 and 5 mm from the root apex, and the surfaces were examined under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The sealer penetration depths were measured at their maximum depths and at four circumferential depths (12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock) and were evaluated using ImageJ software (ImageJ, NIH).
The maximum and mean penetration depths were significantly higher at 5 mm compared to 1 mm from the apex in the AH Plus (p < 0.001), BC Sealer (p < 0.001) and NTS groups (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the groups at 1 mm for both parameters. The maximum and mean penetration depths were significantly lower at 5 mm for AH Plus compared with the other two groups (p = 0.012).
Within the study limitations, the BC Sealer and NTS demonstrated better tubule penetration results than the AH Plus sealer.
Although no study has confirmed a relationship between the penetration depth of root canal sealers and the prevention of apical periodontitis, dentinal tubule sealer penetration may improve obturation quality.
本体外研究旨在评估三种不同密封剂(AH Plus、BC 密封剂和新型硅酸三钙密封剂(NTS))对牙本质小管的渗透情况。
96 颗上颌中切牙被分为三组(每组 n=32),采用单尖技术并用三种密封剂之一(AH Plus、BC 密封剂或 NTS)填充牙胶。每组根尖 1 和 5 毫米处的根管进行横切面切割,并在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)下观察表面。在最大深度和四个周向深度(12、3、6 和 9 点)处测量密封剂的渗透深度,并使用 ImageJ 软件(ImageJ,NIH)进行评估。
与根尖 1 毫米处相比,AH Plus(p<0.001)、BC 密封剂(p<0.001)和 NTS 组(p<0.001)在根尖 5 毫米处的最大和平均渗透深度显著更高。在这两个参数方面,各组在根尖 1 毫米处没有差异。与其他两组相比,AH Plus 在根尖 5 毫米处的最大和平均渗透深度显著更低(p=0.012)。
在研究限制内,BC 密封剂和 NTS 比 AH Plus 密封剂显示出更好的管腔渗透结果。
尽管没有研究证实根管密封剂的渗透深度与根尖周病的预防之间存在关系,但牙本质小管密封剂的渗透可能会改善封闭质量。