• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AH Plus、BC 根管封闭剂和新型硅酸三钙根管封闭剂对牙本质小管渗透的比较:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。

Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Laboratoire OPTIMAG, University of Bretagne Occidentale, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, C.S. 93837, 29238, Brest Cedex 3, France.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1871-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6
PMID:30225679
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the dentinal tubule penetration of three different sealers, AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer (NTS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-six human maxillary central incisors were divided into three experimental groups (n = 32) and were filled with gutta-percha using a single-cone technique in conjunction with one of the three sealers: AH Plus, BC Sealer or NTS. The roots in each group were cross-sectioned at 1 and 5 mm from the root apex, and the surfaces were examined under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The sealer penetration depths were measured at their maximum depths and at four circumferential depths (12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock) and were evaluated using ImageJ software (ImageJ, NIH).

RESULTS

The maximum and mean penetration depths were significantly higher at 5 mm compared to 1 mm from the apex in the AH Plus (p < 0.001), BC Sealer (p < 0.001) and NTS groups (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the groups at 1 mm for both parameters. The maximum and mean penetration depths were significantly lower at 5 mm for AH Plus compared with the other two groups (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the study limitations, the BC Sealer and NTS demonstrated better tubule penetration results than the AH Plus sealer.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although no study has confirmed a relationship between the penetration depth of root canal sealers and the prevention of apical periodontitis, dentinal tubule sealer penetration may improve obturation quality.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在评估三种不同密封剂(AH Plus、BC 密封剂和新型硅酸三钙密封剂(NTS))对牙本质小管的渗透情况。

材料和方法

96 颗上颌中切牙被分为三组(每组 n=32),采用单尖技术并用三种密封剂之一(AH Plus、BC 密封剂或 NTS)填充牙胶。每组根尖 1 和 5 毫米处的根管进行横切面切割,并在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)下观察表面。在最大深度和四个周向深度(12、3、6 和 9 点)处测量密封剂的渗透深度,并使用 ImageJ 软件(ImageJ,NIH)进行评估。

结果

与根尖 1 毫米处相比,AH Plus(p<0.001)、BC 密封剂(p<0.001)和 NTS 组(p<0.001)在根尖 5 毫米处的最大和平均渗透深度显著更高。在这两个参数方面,各组在根尖 1 毫米处没有差异。与其他两组相比,AH Plus 在根尖 5 毫米处的最大和平均渗透深度显著更低(p=0.012)。

结论

在研究限制内,BC 密封剂和 NTS 比 AH Plus 密封剂显示出更好的管腔渗透结果。

临床相关性

尽管没有研究证实根管密封剂的渗透深度与根尖周病的预防之间存在关系,但牙本质小管密封剂的渗透可能会改善封闭质量。

相似文献

1
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.AH Plus、BC 根管封闭剂和新型硅酸三钙根管封闭剂对牙本质小管渗透的比较:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1871-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
2
Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Retreatability of a Calcium Silicate-based Sealer Tested in Bulk or with Different Main Core Material.以整块或不同主要核心材料测试的基于硅酸钙的密封剂的牙本质小管渗透和可退缩性。
J Endod. 2019 Aug;45(8):1036-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
Comparisons of the Retreatment Efficacy of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin-based Sealers and Residual Sealer in Dentinal Tubules.硅酸钙和环氧树脂类封闭剂再治疗效果及牙本质小管内残留封闭剂的比较
J Endod. 2015 Dec;41(12):2025-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.030. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
4
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.不同最终冲洗程序后AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA fillapex和guttaflow生物封闭根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Root Reinforcement after Obturation with Calcium Silicate-based Sealer and Modified Gutta-percha Cone.根管充填后用硅酸钙基密封剂和改良牙胶尖进行根加固。
J Endod. 2018 Dec;44(12):1843-1848. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
The Effect of Primary Root Canal Treatment on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers during Endodontic Retreatment.根管再治疗期间一次根管治疗对硅酸钙类封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响
J Endod. 2022 Sep;48(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
7
Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评价两种不同类型牙胶与根管壁间的封闭效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 May;22(4):1631-1639. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2216-x. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Calcium Silicate-based Root Canal Sealer with Different Obturation Methods.不同充填方法下硅酸钙类根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透情况
J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):633-637. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.023. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers.硅酸三钙封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透
J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):632-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.012. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of 2 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study.氢氧化钙对 2 种不同根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):1018-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Sealing ability of the single-cone obturation technique with bioceramic sealer iRoot SP in oval root canals: an in vitro study.使用生物陶瓷封闭剂iRoot SP的单尖充填技术在椭圆形根管中的封闭能力:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):1364. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06713-9.
2
Evaluation the impact of access cavity design and activation of calcium silicate-based sealer with EDDY and XP-Endo Finisher on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.评估窝洞设计以及使用EDDY和XP-Endo Finisher激活硅酸钙类封闭剂对封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。
Head Face Med. 2025 Jul 26;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00530-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of two observational methods, scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopies, in the adhesive interface analysis of endodontic sealers to root dentine.比较两种观察方法,扫描电子显微镜和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜,在根管封闭剂与牙本质黏附界面分析中的应用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2353-2361. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2336-y. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
2
Effect of Different Irrigating Solutions on Depth of Penetration of Sealer into Dentinal Tubules: A Confocal Microscopic Study.不同冲洗液对封闭剂渗入牙本质小管深度的影响:一项共聚焦显微镜研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):391-394. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_114_17.
3
Evaluation of the Cleanliness and Sealer Penetration of the Root Canal System Following Final Irrigation Using Chelating Agents.
使用螯合剂进行最终冲洗后根管系统清洁度和封闭剂渗透情况的评估
Eur Endod J. 2025 Jul;10(4):307-311. doi: 10.14744/eej.2025.59454.
4
Comparative analysis of dentinal tubule penetration: effects of irrigation activation methods and root canal sealers: in-vitro study.牙本质小管渗透的比较分析:冲洗激活方法和根管封闭剂的影响:体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):991. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06419-y.
5
Evaluation of the tubular penetration of two different types of nanoparticle root canal sealers over apically separated files: a scanning electron microscopic study (in vitro study).两种不同类型的纳米颗粒根管封闭剂在根尖分离锉上的根管渗透评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06263-0.
6
Evaluating the penetration, interfacial adaptation, and push-out bond strength of four bioceramic-based root canal sealers.评估四种生物陶瓷基根管封闭剂的渗透性能、界面适应性和推出粘结强度。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 21;25(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06124-w.
7
Push out bond strength of resin -based endodontic sealer loaded with silver gold nanoparticles in vitro study.载银金纳米颗粒的树脂类根管封闭剂的推出粘结强度:体外研究
BDJ Open. 2025 May 8;11(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00331-x.
8
In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth.单根管牙中冷陶瓷封闭剂与单锥充填技术的边缘适应性与AH-26封闭剂与侧向加压充填技术的边缘适应性的体外比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05314-2.
9
Effect of Cold Plasma on the Penetration Depth of AH26 and Beta Resin Sealers in Dentinal Tubules.冷等离子体对AH26和Beta树脂封闭剂在牙本质小管中渗透深度的影响。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Dec 1;25(4):309-315. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.98146.2059. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Influence of sonic activation of epoxy-resin and calcium silicate sealer on postoperative pain: a patient-blinded, parallel group, randomized clinical trial.声处理对环氧树脂和硅酸钙水门汀的影响:一项盲法、平行组、随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1268. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05049-0.
Sealer penetration and adaptation in root canals with the butterfly effect.
根管封闭剂渗透及适应中的蝴蝶效应
Aust Endod J. 2018 Dec;44(3):225-234. doi: 10.1111/aej.12238. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
Cytotoxic evaluation of a new ceramic-based root canal sealer on human fibroblasts.一种新型陶瓷基根管封闭剂对人成纤维细胞的细胞毒性评估
Eur J Dent. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):141-148. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_2_17.
5
Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Calcium Silicate-based Root Canal Sealer with Different Obturation Methods.不同充填方法下硅酸钙类根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透情况
J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):633-637. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.023. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
Properties of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers.硅酸三钙封闭剂的性能
J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
7
Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在三维细胞培养模型中的细胞相容性
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1531-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1918-9. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers.硅酸三钙封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透
J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):632-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.012. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Micro-CT assessment of the sealing ability of three root canal filling techniques.三种根管充填技术封闭能力的显微CT评估
J Oral Sci. 2015;57(4):361-6. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.57.361.
10
Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers.基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的界面适应性和厚度
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(4):516-21. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-049.