Unité de Recherche sur les Enjeux et Pratiques Humanitaires (UREPH), Médecins Sans Frontières - Switzerland, Rue de Lausanne 78, CH-1211 Genève 21, Switzerland.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:278-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.027. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
Media representations of suffering bodies from medical humanitarian organisations raise ethical questions, which deserve critical attention for at least three reasons. Firstly, there is a normative vacuum at the intersection of medical ethics, humanitarian ethics and the ethics of photojournalism. Secondly, the perpetuation of stereotypes of illness, famine or disasters, and their political derivations are a source of moral criticism, to which humanitarian medicine is not immune. Thirdly, accidental encounters between members of the health professions and members of the press in the humanitarian arena can result in misunderstandings and moral tension. From an ethics perspective the problem can be specified and better understood through two successive stages of reasoning. Firstly, by applying criteria of medical ethics to the concrete example of an advertising poster from a medical humanitarian organisation, I observe that media representations of suffering bodies would generally not meet ethical standards commonly applied in medical practice. Secondly, I try to identify what overriding humanitarian imperatives could outweigh such reservations. The possibility of action and the expression of moral outrage are two relevant humanitarian values which can further be spelt out through a semantic analysis of 'témoignage' (testimony). While the exact balance between the opposing sets of considerations (medical ethics and humanitarian perspectives) is difficult to appraise, awareness of all values at stake is an important initial standpoint for ethical deliberations of media representations of suffering bodies. Future pragmatic approaches to the issue should include: exploring ethical values endorsed by photojournalism, questioning current social norms about the display of suffering, collecting empirical data from past or potential victims of disasters in diverse cultural settings, and developing new canons with more creative or less problematic representations of suffering bodies than the currently accepted stereotypes.
媒体对医疗人道主义组织所呈现的受苦身体的描述引发了伦理问题,这些问题至少有三个原因值得批判性关注。首先,在医学伦理、人道主义伦理和新闻摄影伦理的交叉点存在规范真空。其次,疾病、饥荒或灾难的刻板印象的延续,以及它们的政治衍生,是道德批评的一个来源,人道主义医学也不能幸免。第三,卫生专业人员和新闻界成员在人道主义领域偶然相遇,可能会导致误解和道德紧张。从伦理学的角度来看,这个问题可以通过两个连续的推理阶段来具体说明和更好地理解。首先,通过将医学伦理标准应用于医疗人道主义组织广告海报的具体例子,我观察到媒体对受苦身体的描述通常不符合通常在医学实践中应用的伦理标准。其次,我试图确定什么是可以超越这些保留意见的人道主义至上命令。行动的可能性和表达道德愤慨是两个相关的人道主义价值观,可以通过对“témoignage”(证词)的语义分析进一步阐明。虽然很难评估对立考虑因素(医学伦理和人道主义观点)之间的精确平衡,但意识到所有相关的价值观是对媒体对受苦身体的描述进行伦理思考的重要起点。未来对这个问题的务实方法应该包括:探索新闻摄影所认可的伦理价值观,质疑当前关于展示痛苦的社会规范,从不同文化背景的灾难的过去或潜在受害者那里收集经验数据,并制定新的规范,以比目前接受的刻板印象更有创意或更没有问题的方式来描绘受苦身体。